Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962452›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Implementing a comprehensive newborn monitoring chart: Barriers, enablers, and opportunities.

Naomi Muinga, Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde, Lenka Benova, Chris Paton, Mike English, Marjolein Zweekhorst

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 7 countries.

Naomi MuingaAthena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0749-0255
Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade AbejirindeAthena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0139-0541
Lenka BenovaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Sexual and Reproductive Health Group, Antwerp, Belgium.
Chris PatonNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, GB, England.
Mike EnglishKEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7427-0826
Marjolein ZweekhorstAthena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7015-4951
Angkor Hospital for Children · KHAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEKenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

EPA EP-C-15-003Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Documenting inpatient care is largely paper-based and it facilitates team communication and future care planning. However, studies show that nursing documentation remains suboptimal especially for newborns, necessitating introduction of standardised paper-based charts. We report on a process of implementing a comprehensive newborn monitoring chart and the perceptions of health workers in a network of hospitals in Kenya. The chart was launched virtually in July 2020 followed by learning meetings with nurses and the research team. This is a qualitative study involving document review, individual in-depth interviews with nurses and paediatricians and a focus group discussion with data clerks. The chart was co-designed by the research team and hospital staff then implemented using a trainer of trainers' model where the nurses-in-charge were trained on how to use the chart and they in turn trained their staff. Training at the hospital was delivered by the nurse-in-charge and/or paediatrician through a combined training with all staff or one-on-one training. The chart was well received with health workers reporting reduced writing, consolidated information, and improved communication as benefits. Implementation was facilitated by individual and team factors, complementary projects, and the removal of old charts. However, challenges arose related to the staff and work environment, inadequate supply of charts, alternative places to document, and inadequate equipment. The participants suggested that future implementation should be accompanied by mentorship or close follow-up, peer experience sharing, training at the hospital and in pre-service institutions and wider stakeholder engagement. Findings show that there are opportunities to improve the implementation process by clarifying roles relating to the filing system, improving the chart supply process, staff induction and specifying a newborn patient file. The chart did not meet the need for supporting documentation of long stay patients presenting an opportunity to explore digital solutions that might provide more flexibility and features.

Identifiers

PMID36962452
PMCPMC10021603
OpenAlexW4287578154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read4
identifiers read4
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.