Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962439›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Comparing variability in diagnosis of upper respiratory tract infections in patients using syndromic, next generation sequencing, and PCR-based methods.

Andrew W Bartlow, Zachary R Stromberg, Cheryl D Gleasner, Bin Hu, Karen W Davenport, Shailja Jakhar, Po-E Li, Molly Vosburg, Madhavi Garimella, Patrick S G Chain and 3 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Microbial keratitis in the age of resistance: unlocking the therapeutic potential of phage therapy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew W BartlowBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1254-4481
Zachary R StrombergPhysical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, Chemistry Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Cheryl D GleasnerBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9949-292X
Bin HuBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0278-8466
Karen W DavenportBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2740-1344
Shailja JakharPhysical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, Chemistry Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Po-E LiBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4290-1993
Molly VosburgMedical Associates of Northern New Mexico, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Madhavi GarimellaMedical Associates of Northern New Mexico, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Patrick S G ChainBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-3634
Tracy H ErkkilaBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7012-9921
Jeanne M FairBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3377-6134
Harshini MukundanPhysical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, Chemistry Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0931-0545
Los Alamos National Laboratory · USLos Alamos Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early and accurate diagnosis of respiratory pathogens and associated outbreaks can allow for the control of spread, epidemiological modeling, targeted treatment, and decision making-as is evident with the current COVID-19 pandemic. Many respiratory infections share common symptoms, making them difficult to diagnose using only syndromic presentation. Yet, with delays in getting reference laboratory tests and limited availability and poor sensitivity of point-of-care tests, syndromic diagnosis is the most-relied upon method in clinical practice today. Here, we examine the variability in diagnostic identification of respiratory infections during the annual infection cycle in northern New Mexico, by comparing syndromic diagnostics with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing-based methods, with the goal of assessing gaps in our current ability to identify respiratory pathogens. Of 97 individuals that presented with symptoms of respiratory infection, only 23 were positive for at least one RNA virus, as confirmed by sequencing. Whereas influenza virus (n = 7) was expected during this infection cycle, we also observed coronavirus (n = 7), respiratory syncytial virus (n = 8), parainfluenza virus (n = 4), and human metapneumovirus (n = 1) in individuals with respiratory infection symptoms. Four patients were coinfected with two viruses. In 21 individuals that tested positive using PCR, RNA sequencing completely matched in only 12 (57%) of these individuals. Few individuals (37.1%) were diagnosed to have an upper respiratory tract infection or viral syndrome by syndromic diagnostics, and the type of virus could only be distinguished in one patient. Thus, current syndromic diagnostic approaches fail to accurately identify respiratory pathogens associated with infection and are not suited to capture emerging threats in an accurate fashion. We conclude there is a critical and urgent need for layered agnostic diagnostics to track known and unknown pathogens at the point of care to control future outbreaks.

Identifiers

PMID36962439
PMCPMC10022352
OpenAlexW4286008132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read137
identifiers read8
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.