Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962426›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Performance of highly sensitive and conventional rapid diagnostic tests for clinical and subclinical Plasmodium falciparum infections, and hrp2/3 deletion status in Burundi.

David Niyukuri, Denis Sinzinkayo, Emma V Troth, Colins O Oduma, Mediatrice Barengayabo, Mireille Ndereyimana, Aurel Holzschuh, Claudia A Vera-Arias, Yilekal Gebre, Kingsley Badu and 4 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. High-AltitudeOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A NovelmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

David NiyukuriDoctoral School, University of Burundi, Bujumbura, Burundi.
Denis SinzinkayoDoctoral School, University of Burundi, Bujumbura, Burundi.
Emma V TrothEck Institute for Global Health and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5879-7695
Colins O OdumaKenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Mediatrice BarengayaboDoctoral School, University of Burundi, Bujumbura, Burundi.
Mireille NdereyimanaDoctoral School, University of Burundi, Bujumbura, Burundi.
Aurel HolzschuhEck Institute for Global Health and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2681-1114
Claudia A Vera-AriasEck Institute for Global Health and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Yilekal GebreEck Institute for Global Health and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Kingsley BaduKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Joseph NyandwiDoctoral School, University of Burundi, Bujumbura, Burundi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3715-7891
Dismas BazaWHO Country Office, Bujumbura, Burundi.
Elizabeth JumaWHO African Region, Accra, Ghana.
Cristian KoepfliEck Institute for Global Health and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9354-0414
Université du Burundi · BIUniversity of Notre Dame · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KEKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHRepublic of Burundi · BI

Funding

A Novel Droplet Digital PCR Method for Population-based Plasmodium falciparum hrp2 Deletion DiagnosisR21AI137891 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI KOEPFLI, CRISTIAN · 2018 to 2019
$425k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI137891World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are a key tool for the diagnosis of malaria infections among clinical and subclinical individuals. Low-density infections, and deletions of the P. falciparum hrp2/3 genes (encoding the HRP2 and HRP3 proteins detected by many RDTs) present challenges for RDT-based diagnosis. The novel Rapigen Biocredit three-band Plasmodium falciparum HRP2/LDH RDT was evaluated among 444 clinical and 468 subclinical individuals in a high transmission setting in Burundi. Results were compared to the AccessBio CareStart HRP2 RDT, and qPCR with a sensitivity of <0.3 parasites/μL blood. Sensitivity compared to qPCR among clinical patients for the Biocredit RDT was 79.9% (250/313, either of HRP2/LDH positive), compared to 73.2% (229/313) for CareStart (P = 0.048). Specificity of the Biocredit was 82.4% compared to 96.2% for CareStart. Among subclinical infections, sensitivity was 72.3% (162/224) compared to 58.5% (131/224) for CareStart (P = 0.003), and reached 88.3% (53/60) in children <15 years. Specificity was 84.4% for the Biocredit and 93.4% for the CareStart RDT. No (0/362) hrp2 and 2/366 hrp3 deletions were observed. In conclusion, the novel RDT showed improved sensitivity for the diagnosis of P. falciparum.

Identifiers

PMID36962426
PMCPMC10022336
OpenAlexW4288445115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read112
identifiers read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.