ArticlePLOS global public health2022
An assessment of vaccine wastage in the Solomon Islands.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Voluntary information and price sharing database - a scoping review of the pricing and procurement landscape across eight Commonwealth Member States.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Review
- Article
- Minimizing Vaccine Wastage in Nigeria: A National Assessment of Vaccine Wastage Rates and Potential Determinants.Vaccines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calculating vaccine wastage rates supports vaccine forecasting and prevents stock outs/over-stock at central and immunisation delivery facilities. Ensuring there are sufficient vaccines on the several small islands of The Solomon Island while minimising waste is a challenge. Twenty-two health facilities were selected randomly from six purposefully identified provinces in the Solomon Islands and across the different levels of the health service. Additional data were obtained from the national medical stores and the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI) monthly reports for 2017 and 2018. All the selected facilities were visited to observe stock management practices. We calculated wastage rates for each vaccine antigen in the EPI and described the type of wastage. We found a wide variation in the average wastage rates at the second level medical stores which may be attributed to the partial availability of wastage data. The overall wastage rate for 20-dose BCG was 38.9% (18.5-59.3), 10-dose OPV was 33.6% (8.1-59.1), and single dose PCV was 4.5% (-4.4-13.5). The data from the two smaller and farthest provinces were incomplete/not available and did not contribute to the overall wastage rates. About 50% of the reported wasted doses at the facility were reported as "damaged" vials. Wastage rates were high for the multidose vials and slightly lower for the single dose vials which were also higher than the indicative rates. There is a need to improve recording of vaccine wastage through continuous monitoring for better forecasting and program effectiveness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.