Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962370›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Identifying effective interventions to promote consumption of protein-rich foods from lower ecological footprint sources: A systematic literature review.

Rimante Ronto, Golsa Saberi, Gianna Maxi Leila Robbers, Stephanie Godrich, Mark Lawrence, Shawn Somerset, Jessica Fanzo, Josephine Y Chau

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rimante RontoDepartment of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3830-8329
Golsa SaberiDepartment of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0441-6110
Gianna Maxi Leila RobbersNossal Institute of Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Stephanie GodrichSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
Mark LawrenceInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6899-3983
Shawn SomersetFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4922-3593
Jessica FanzoDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6760-1359
Josephine Y ChauDepartment of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUDeakin University · AUEdith Cowan University · AUJohns Hopkins University · USThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Canberra · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addressing overconsumption of protein-rich foods from high ecological footprint sources can have positive impacts on health such as reduction of non-communicable disease risk and protecting the natural environment. With the increased attention towards development of ecologically sustainable diets, this systematic review aimed to critically review literature on effectiveness of those interventions aiming to promote protein-rich foods from lower ecological footprint sources. Five electronic databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Global Health) were searched for articles published up to January 2021. Quantitative studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported on actual or intended consumption of protein-rich animal-derived and/or plant-based foods; purchase, or selection of meat/plant-based diet in real or virtual environments. We assessed 140 full-text articles for eligibility of which 51 were included in this review. The results were narratively synthesised. Included studies were categorised into individual level behaviour change interventions (n = 33) which included education, counselling and self-monitoring, and micro-environmental/structural behaviour change interventions (n = 18) which included menu manipulation, choice architecture and multicomponent approaches. Half of individual level interventions (52%) aimed to reduce red/processed meat intake among people with current/past chronic conditions which reduced meat intake in the short term. The majority of micro-environmental studies focused on increasing plant-based diet in dining facilities, leading to positive dietary changes. These findings point to a clear gap in the current evidence base for interventions that promote plant-based diet in the general population.

Identifiers

PMID36962370
PMCPMC10021177
OpenAlexW4220878303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read141
reference markers read38
identifiers read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.