Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962367›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Effect of peer-mother interactive programme on prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission outcomes among pregnant women on anti-retroviral treatment in routine healthcare in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Goodluck Willey Lyatuu, Helga Naburi, Shally Mwashemele, Peter Lyaruu, Roseline Urrio, Brenda Simba, Emmanuel Philipo, Ayoub Kibao, Deborah Kajoka, David Sando and 4 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Goodluck Willey LyatuuManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0779-5515
Helga NaburiDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1659-5224
Shally MwashemeleHealth Section, United Nations Children's Fund, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7693-2723
Peter LyaruuManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Roseline UrrioManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Brenda SimbaManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2194-7725
Emmanuel PhilipoManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ayoub KibaoDepartment of Health and Social Welfare, Regional Administrative Secretary, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Deborah KajokaDepartment of Preventive Services, Tanzania Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dodoma, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8269-2535
David SandoManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0246-8195
Nicola OrsiniDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-5634
Gunnel BiberfeldDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Charles KilewoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Anna Mia EkströmDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3912-1171
Management and Development for Health · TZMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZKarolinska Institutet · SEMinistry of Health and Social Welfare · TZMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer support services are increasingly being integrated in programmes for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT). We aimed to evaluate the effect of a peer-mother interactive programme on PMTCT outcomes among pregnant women on anti-retroviral treatment (ART) in routine healthcare in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Twenty-three health facilities were cluster-randomized to a peer-mother intervention and 24 to a control arm. We trained 92 ART experienced women with HIV to offer peer education, adherence and psychosocial support to women enrolling in PMTCT care at the intervention facilities. All pregnant women who enrolled in PMTCT care at the 47 facilities from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2019 were identified and followed up to 31st July 2021. The primary outcome was time to ART attrition (no show >90 days since the scheduled appointment, excluding transfers) and any difference in one-year retention in PMTCT and ART care between intervention and control facilities. Secondary outcomes were maternal viral suppression (<400 viral copies/mL) and mother-to-child HIV transmission (MTCT) by ≥12 months post-partum. Analyses were done using Kaplan Meier and Cox regression (ART retention/attrition), generalized estimating equations (viral suppression) and random effects logistic regression (MTCT); reporting rates, proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CI). There were 1957 women in the peer-mother and 1384 in the control facilities who enrolled in routine PMTCT care during 2018-2019 and were followed for a median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 23 [10, 31] months. Women in both groups had similar median age of 30 [IQR 25, 35] years, but differed slightly with regard to proportions in the third pregnancy trimester (14% versus 19%); advanced HIV (22% versus 27%); and ART naïve (55% versus 47%). Peer-mother facilities had a significantly lower attrition rate per 1000 person months (95%CI) of 14 (13, 16) versus 18 (16, 19) and significantly higher one-year ART retention (95%CI) of 78% (76, 80) versus 74% (71, 76) in un-adjusted analyses, however in adjusted analyses the effect size was not statistically significant [adjusted hazard ratio of attrition (95%CI) = 0.85 (0.67, 1.08)]. Viral suppression (95%CI) was similar in both groups [92% (91, 93) versus 91% (90, 92)], but significantly higher among ART naïve women in peer-mother [91% (89, 92)] versus control [88% (86, 90)] facilities. MTCT (95%CI) was similar in both groups [2.2% (1.4, 3.4) versus 1.5% (0.7, 2.8)]. In conclusion, we learned that integration of peer-mother services in routine PMTCT care improved ART retention among all women and viral suppression among ART naïve women but had no significant influence on MTCT.

Identifiers

PMID36962367
PMCPMC10021914
OpenAlexW4220753054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read84
identifiers read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.