Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962326›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Most common reasons for primary care visits in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Jacob Bigio, Emily MacLean, Nathaly Aguilera Vasquez, Lavanya Huria, Mikashmi Kohli, Genevieve Gore, Emma Hannay, Madhukar Pai, Pierrick Adam

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jacob BigioResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2929-4252
Emily MacLeanMcGill International TB Centre, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-0985
Nathaly Aguilera VasquezResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1019-8597
Lavanya HuriaDept of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7835-0372
Mikashmi KohliMcGill International TB Centre, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7402-5791
Genevieve GoreSchulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-2683
Emma HannayFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0464-3882
Madhukar PaiMcGill International TB Centre, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-4536
Pierrick AdamInfectious Diseases Programs Control Unit, Ministry of Health, Tahiti, French Polynesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2986-4641
McGill University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAFIND · CHManipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the Covid-19 pandemic and the introduction of the WHO's Essential Diagnostics List (EDL), increasing global attention is focused on the crucial role of diagnostics in achieving universal health coverage. To create national EDLs and to aid health system planning, it is vital to understand the most common conditions with which people present at primary care health facilities. We undertook a systematic review of the most common reasons for primary care visits in low- and middle-income countries. Six databases were searched for articles published between January 2009 and December 2019, with the search updated on MEDLINE to January 2021. Data on the most common patient reasons for encounter (RFEs) and provider diagnoses were collected. 17 of 22,279 screened articles were included. Most studies used unvalidated diagnostic classification systems or presented provider diagnosis data grouped by organ system, rather than presenting specific diagnoses. No studies included data from low-income countries. Only four studies (from Brazil, India, Nigeria and South Africa) using the ICPC-2 classification system contained RFE and provider diagnosis data and could be pooled. The top five RFEs from the four studies were headache, fever, back or low back symptom, cough and pain general/multiple sites. The top five diagnoses were uncomplicated hypertension, upper respiratory tract infection, type 2 diabetes, malaria and health maintenance/prevention. No psychological symptoms were among the top 10 pooled RFEs. There was more variation in top diagnoses between studies than top RFEs, showing the importance of creating location-specific lists of essential diagnostics for primary care. Future studies should aim to sample primary care facilities from across their country of study and use ICPC-3 to report both patient RFEs and provider diagnoses.

Identifiers

PMID36962326
PMCPMC10022248
OpenAlexW4225291166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
identifiers read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.