Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962320›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Understanding factors influencing utilization of HIV prevention and treatment services among patients and providers in a heterogeneous setting: A qualitative study from South Africa.

Lucy Chimoyi, Jeremiah Chikovore, Eustasius Musenge, Tonderai Mabuto, Candice M Chetty-Makkan, Reuben Munyai, Tshegang Nchachi, Salome Charalambous, Geoffrey Setswe

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lucy ChimoyiImplementation Research Division, The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0083-8319
Jeremiah ChikovoreHuman and Social Capabilities Research Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4910-6952
Eustasius MusengeSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3382-2372
Tonderai MabutoImplementation Research Division, The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5784-746X
Candice M Chetty-MakkanHealth Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE2RO), Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9292-9586
Reuben MunyaiImplementation Research Division, The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Tshegang NchachiImplementation Research Division, The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Salome CharalambousImplementation Research Division, The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-1009
Geoffrey SetsweImplementation Research Division, The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3646-0722
University of the Witwatersrand · ZAAurum Institute · ZAHuman Sciences Research Council · ZAUniversity of South Africa · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances made in HIV prevention and treatment interventions in South Africa, barriers to their utilization continue to exist. Understanding perspectives from patients and providers of healthcare can shed light on the necessary strategies to enhance uptake of HIV services. A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted in July 2020 in Ekurhuleni District. Based on HIV prevalence estimates from a national survey, male condom use coverage and antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation rates from routinely collected clinical data for 2012, we selected facilities from geographical areas with varying HIV prevalence and uptake of HIV services. In-depth interviews were conducted with adult (≥18 years) patients and healthcare workers in selected primary healthcare facilities. Thematic analysis was performed following a framework built around the social cognitive theory to describe behavioural, personal, and social/environmental factors influencing utilization of HIV services. Behavioural factors facilitating uptake of HIV services included awareness of the protective value of condoms, and the benefits of ART in suppressing viral load and preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission which was evident across geographical areas. Barriers in high prevalence areas included suboptimal condom use, fears of a positive HIV result, and anticipated HIV-related stigma while seeking healthcare services. Across the geographical areas, personal factors included ability to correctly use available services enhanced by knowledge acquired during counselling sessions and community-based health promotion activities. Further, social support from family reinforced engagement in care. Compared to low uptake areas, clinics in high uptake areas used care-facilitators, outreach teams and decanting programs to address the environmental barriers including staff shortages and long queues. Barriers at multiple levels prevent optimal utilization of HIV services, calling for strategies that target and address the different levels and tailored to needs of specific settings. Overall, improved delivery of HIV prevention or treatment interventions can be achieved through strengthening training of healthcare providers in facilities and communities and addressing negative sequelae from utilising services in low uptake areas.

Identifiers

PMID36962320
PMCPMC10021737
OpenAlexW4210517994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read9
identifiers read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.