Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962313›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Community engaged tick surveillance and tickMAP as a public health tool to track the emergence of ticks and tick-borne diseases in New York.

Charles E Hart, Jahnavi Reddy Bhaskar, Erin Reynolds, Meghan Hermance, Martin Earl, Matthew Mahoney, Ana Martinez, Ivona Petzlova, Allen T Esterly, Saravanan Thangamani

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Why are the ticks winning, and what can we do about it?Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Innovations in public health surveillance: An overview of novel use of data and analytic methods.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Tick species infesting humans in the United States.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charles E HartDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Jahnavi Reddy BhaskarDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Erin ReynoldsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2847-0982
Meghan HermanceDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0494-9670
Martin EarlMoonshot Team, Information Management and Technology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2917-0746
Matthew MahoneyMoonshot Team, Information Management and Technology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Ana MartinezMoonshot Team, Information Management and Technology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0919-2435
Ivona PetzlovaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6537-9782
Allen T EsterlyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1132-6797
Saravanan ThangamaniDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4269-5993
SUNY Upstate Medical University · USUniversity of South Alabama · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A community engaged passive surveillance program was utilized to acquire ticks and associated information throughout New York state. Ticks were speciated and screened for several tick-borne pathogens. Of these ticks, only I. scapularis was commonly infected with pathogens of human relevance, including B. burgdorferi, B. miyamotoi, A. phagocytophilum, B. microti, and Powassan virus. In addition, the geographic and temporal distribution of tick species and pathogens was determined. This enabled the construction of a powerful visual analytical mapping tool, tickMAP to track the emergence of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in real-time. The public can use this tool to identify hot-spots of disease emergence, clinicians for supportive evidence during differential diagnosis, and researchers to better understand factors influencing the emergence of ticks and tick-borne diseases in New York. Overall, we have created a community-engaged tick surveillance program and an interactive visual analytical tickMAP that other regions could emulate to provide real-time tracking and an early warning for the emergence of tick-borne diseases.

Identifiers

PMID36962313
PMCPMC10022224
OpenAlexW4283579486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read117
identifiers read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.