Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962285›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Partnership-defined quality approach to companionship during labour and birth in East New Britain, Papua New Guinea: A mixed-methods study.

Alyce N Wilson, Pele Melepia, Rose Suruka, Priscah Hezeri, Dukduk Kabiu, Delly Babona, Pinip Wapi, Meghan A Bohren, Joshua P Vogel, Angela Kelly-Hanku and 7 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Alyce N WilsonMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9229-789X
Pele MelepiaMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3137-4502
Rose SurukaMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Priscah HezeriMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8272-7614
Dukduk KabiuMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Delly BabonaSt Mary's Hospital, Kokopo, Papua New Guinea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-1270
Pinip WapiNonga General Hospital, Rabaul, Papua New Guinea.
Meghan A BohrenGender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-4682
Joshua P VogelMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-7096
Angela Kelly-HankuPapua New Guinea Institute for Medical Research, Goroka, Papua New Guinea.
Alison MorganNossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5380-1619
James G BeesonMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1018-7898
Christopher MorganMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0931-5474
Naomi SpotswoodMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1044-4604
Michelle J L ScoullarMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1417-1524
Lisa M VallelyPapua New Guinea Institute for Medical Research, Goroka, Papua New Guinea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-7683
Caroline S E HomerMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Companionship during labour and birth is a critical component of quality maternal and newborn care, resulting in improved care experiences and better birth outcomes. Little is known about the preferences and experiences of companionship in Papua New Guinea (PNG), and how it can be implemented in a culturally appropriate way. The aim of this study was to describe perspectives and experiences of women, their partners and health providers regarding labour and birth companionship, identify enablers and barriers and develop a framework for implementing this intervention in PNG health facilities. A mixed methods study was conducted with five facilities in East New Britain, PNG. Data included 5 facility audits, 30 labour observations and 29 in-depth interviews with women who had recently given birth, partners and maternity care providers. A conceptual framework was developed drawing on existing quality care implementation frameworks. Women and partners wanted companions to be present, whilst health providers had mixed views. Participants described benefits of companionship including encouragement and physical support for women, better communication and advocacy, improved labour outcomes and assistance with workforce issues. Adequate privacy and space constraints were highlighted as key barriers to address. Of the women observed, only 30% of women had a companion present during labour, and 10% had a companion at birth. A conceptual framework was used to highlight the interconnected inputs required at community, facility and provincial health system levels to improve the quality of care. Key elements to address included attitudes towards companionship, the need for education and training and restrictive hospital policies. Supporting women to have their companion of choice present during labour and birth is critical to improving women's experiences of care and improving the quality of maternal and newborn care. In order to provide companionship during labour and birth in PNG, a complex, intersecting, multi-faceted approach is required.

Identifiers

PMID36962285
PMCPMC10021905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read11
identifiers read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.