ArticlePLOS global public health2022
Effect of emergency obstetric care and proximity to comprehensive facilities on facility-based delivery in Malawi and Haiti.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proximity of households to comprehensive obstetric care is a key determinant for preventing maternal mortality due to obstetric emergencies. The relationship between proximity to comprehensive care and facility delivery is further complicated by the use of varied methods in measuring facility obstetric capacity-which may misrepresent the real scenario of obstetric care availability in a service environment. We investigated the joint effects of proximity and two emergency obstetric care assessment (EmOC) methods on women's place of delivery in Malawi and Haiti. Household level and health facility data were obtained from the 2013-2018 Demographic and Health Surveys and Service Provision Assessment surveys. Records of women aged 15 to 49 years who had a childbirth in the last 5 years were linked to obstetric facilities within 5km, 10km and 15km from their households using Kernel Density Estimation. Log-binomial models were fitted to estimate the joint effects of proximity to comprehensive facilities on place of delivery and two EmOC methods (1. the facility's recent performance of signal functions only, and 2. a composite index of obstetric care), and whether this varied by urban/rural setting. Proximity to comprehensive facilities was significantly associated with facility delivery in Malawi among women living 5km of a comprehensive facility (using EmOC method 2), in addition, living further (15km) from facilities with high capacity of EmOC was associated with reduced likelihood for facility delivery in urban settings in stratified analyses. In contrast, positive associations were present in Haiti in both urban and rural settings, with the likelihood of facility delivery being higher with greater proximity of women to comprehensive facilities, regardless of methods to define EmOC. Women living within 5km of a comprehensive facility in Haiti were the most likely to deliver in facilities based on EmOC method 1 (APR: 1.81, 95% CI 1.56, 2.09). Findings from Malawi elucidates the relevance of context and suggests the need for research in diverse settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.