Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962242›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Measurement tools and indicators for assessing nurturing care for early childhood development: A scoping review.

Joshua Jeong, Lilia Bliznashka, Eileen Sullivan, Elizabeth Hentschel, Youngkwang Jeon, Kathleen L Strong, Bernadette Daelmans

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldFull text readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joshua JeongDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4130-468X
Lilia BliznashkaDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2084-1141
Eileen SullivanHarvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5949-2850
Elizabeth HentschelDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6995-8426
Youngkwang JeonHarvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0938-7024
Kathleen L StrongDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8092-1955
Bernadette DaelmansDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9044-9693
Harvard Global Health Institute · USWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Engaging and Supporting Fathers: A Parenting Intervention to Improve Early Child Development in TanzaniaK99HD105984 · NICHD · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI JEONG, JOSHUA · 2021 to 2022
$257k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD105984World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nurturing care encompasses five components that are crucial for supporting early childhood development: good health, adequate nutrition, opportunities for early learning, responsive caregiving, and safety and security. While there has been increasing attention in global public health towards designing and delivering programs, services, and policies to promote nurturing care, measurement has focused more on the components of health and nutrition, with less attention to early learning, responsive caregiving, and safety and security. We conducted a scoping review to identify articles that measured at least one nurturing care outcome in a sample of caregivers and/or children under-5 years of age in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We systematically searched five electronic bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed articles published from database inception until November 30, 2020. We first classified outcomes to their respective nurturing care component, and then applied an inductive approach to organize key constructs within each nurturing care component and the specific measures and indicators used across studies. We identified 239 total articles representing more than 50 LMICs for inclusion in the review. The majority of included studies reported a measure of nutrition (N = 166), early learning (N = 140), and health (N = 102), followed by responsive caregiving (N = 78) and lastly safety and security (N = 45). For each nurturing care component, we uncovered multiple constructs relevant to children under-5: nutrition (e.g., anthropometry, complementary feeding), early learning (e.g., stimulation practices, early childhood education), health (e.g., birth outcomes, morbidity), responsive caregiving (e.g., parental responsivity, parent-child interactions), and safety and security (e.g., discipline, inadequate supervision). Particularly for outcomes of early learning and responsive caregiving, there was greater variability with regards to the measures used, reported indicators, and analytic construction of variables than the other three nurturing care components. This study provides a comprehensive review of the current state of measurement of nurturing care. Additional research is needed in order to establish the most optimal measures and indicators for assessing nurturing care, especially for early learning and responsive caregiving.

Identifiers

PMID36962242
PMCPMC10021181
OpenAlexW4224839109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read190
identifiers read12
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.