Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962226›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Effectiveness of government policies in response to the first COVID-19 outbreak.

Theologos Dergiades, Costas Milas, Elias Mossialos, Theodore Panagiotidis

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A pandemic momentum index to manage the spread of COVID-19.Technological forecasting and social change · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Variation in Global Policy Responses to COVID-19: A Bidirectional Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Theologos DergiadesDepartment of International & European Studies, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Costas MilasManagement School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-384X
Elias MossialosDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-9297
Theodore PanagiotidisDepartment of Economics, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-3054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper assesses the quantitative impact of government interventions on deaths related to the first COVID-19 outbreak. Using daily data for 32 countries and relying on the stringency of the conducted policies, we find that the greater the strength of government interventions at an early stage, the more effective these are in slowing down or reversing the growth rate of deaths. School closures have a significant impact on reducing the growth rate of deaths, which is less powerful compared to the case where a number of policy interventions are combined together. These results can be informative for governments in responding to future pandemics.

Identifiers

PMID36962226
PMCPMC10021334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read41
identifiers read11
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.