ArticlePLOS global public health2022
A day in the life: Using contextual interviews to understand the health of home-based Mapuche weavers.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The craft sector employs 305 million people worldwide, primarily women, rural and home-based workers. Home-based weavers, an understudied workforce, are subject to a range of hazards and adverse health effects related to their weaving work and domestic responsibilities (e.g., housework, farm work, childcare, eldercare). The Mapuche represent Chile's largest Indigenous group with about 20 percent residing in the Araucanía region, where agriculture and tourism, including craftwork, are important sources of income. Using a purposive sampling approach, we conducted Spanish-language contextual interviews (N = 10) with Mapuche weavers across four communities, allowing us to observe participants in their home settings, watching them weave and discussing tasks, decision-making, and behaviors during the work process. Participants ranged in age from 29-55 years. A combination of semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews, videos, photographs and written observations yielded a time-wheel of a typical day for each weaver; the types of weaving and non-weaving work (including hours per day); workspace visuals; self-reported health problems, causes and treatments; exposure hazards; and potential ergonomic interventions. In addition to weaving, housework (n = 10), farm work (n = 7), wool production (n = 7), natural and chemical dyeing (n = 7) and child-rearing (n = 4) were identified as work activities. The most commonly cited weaving-related health problems were eyestrain (n = 7) and pain in the back (n = 6), shoulder (n = 5), arm (n = 4), hand (n = 4), neck (n = 3), wrist (n = 3) and fingers (n = 3). When asked to identify potential improvements to their weaving workspace, participants identified the need to having a dedicated workspace for weaving (n = 7), improving their existing workspace with better seating (n = 4), lighting (n = 3), insulation (n = 2) and increasing the size of their workspace (n = 2). This methodology, blending traditional occupational health tools with qualitative methods, was instrumental in understanding the range of hazards associated with home-based work and identifying potential ergonomic interventions for this global workforce.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.