Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962210›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Are return-of-service bursaries an effective investment to build health workforce capacity? A qualitative study of key South African policymakers.

Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda, Andrea Durbach, Wezile W Chitha, Blake Angell, Rohina Joshi

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sikhumbuzo A MabundaSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9458-3742
Andrea DurbachAustralian Human Rights Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Wezile W ChithaHealth Systems Enablement and Innovation Unit, University of The Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5837-924X
Blake AngellThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-7740
Rohina JoshiSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3374-401X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Return-of-service schemes (RoS) or bursaries are used in South Africa and other nations to publicly fund the training of skilled health professionals in return for the beneficiary agreeing to return to serve in their local provinces on a year-for-year basis. This study aimed to understand insights of key policymakers in South African provinces to identify barriers and solutions to implementation of RoS schemes used to recruit and retain skilled health professionals. This research draws on the insights of 16 key South African policymakers from eight of its nine provinces through semi-structured, qualitative interviews. The respondents were interviewed through Microsoft Teams virtual platform, either in pairs (ten) or as individuals (six). Data were analysed using inductive, thematic analysis in NVIVO. The study was reported according to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Respondents reported that the schemes had resulted in an increase in the number of skilled health professionals and had provided opportunities for study and employment for previously marginalised groups. Formal evaluations of the impact of the schemes were not reported, however, a number of shortcomings with current schemes were identified that were likely limiting their effectiveness. Respondents reported a lack of foresight in the scheme implementation including a bias in the selection of beneficiaries towards medical professionals at the expense of other health workers. Furthermore, failure to plan for practice location when beneficiaries finished training limited the capacity of the schemes to meet the needs of local populations. Monitoring of recipients was limited by loopholes in contract design, decision-making and poor coordination between departments. Between 1 and 30% of beneficiaries were reported to default their contracts with some not completing their studies, some not returning after completing their internship and others terminating their services before concluding their contracts. Return-of-service schemes have helped in overcoming health professional shortages. However, they haven't been formally evaluated. Several planning and implementation shortcomings were identified which can be improved to enhance access to healthcare in South Africa.

Identifiers

PMID36962210
PMCPMC10021585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read6
identifiers read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.