Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962179›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Modeling robust COVID-19 intensive care unit occupancy thresholds for imposing mitigation to prevent exceeding capacities.

Manuela Runge, Reese A K Richardson, Patrick A Clay, Arielle Bell, Tobias M Holden, Manisha Singam, Natsumi Tsuboyama, Philip Arevalo, Jane Fornoff, Sarah Patrick and 2 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Trajectory-oriented optimization of stochastic epidemiological models.Proceedings of the ... Winter Simulation Conference. Winter Simulation Conference · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19 Patterns in Araraquara, Brazil: A Multimodal Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Screening and confirmation tests for SARS-CoV-2: benefits and drawbacks.Beni-Suef University journal of basic and applied sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Manuela RungeDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9918-760X
Reese A K RichardsonDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6058-5886
Patrick A ClayDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3491-9985
Arielle BellDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6973-9052
Tobias M HoldenNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0793-9585
Manisha SingamNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Natsumi TsuboyamaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8620-3479
Philip ArevaloDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-2314
Jane FornoffIllinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL, United States of America.
Sarah PatrickIllinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL, United States of America.
Ngozi O EzikeIllinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL, United States of America.
Jaline GerardinDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8071-9928

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008152 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ARDEHALI, HOSSEIN · 1987 to 2021
$24.0M
Developing Capacity to Evaluate Training Programs via Development of Human, Institutional and Social CapitalT32GM008449 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LEONARD, JOSHUA NATHANIEL · 1993 to 2023
$7.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008152NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In non-pharmaceutical management of COVID-19, occupancy of intensive care units (ICU) is often used as an indicator to inform when to intensify mitigation and thus reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, strain on ICUs, and deaths. However, ICU occupancy thresholds at which action should be taken are often selected arbitrarily. We propose a quantitative approach using mathematical modeling to identify ICU occupancy thresholds at which mitigation should be triggered to avoid exceeding the ICU capacity available for COVID-19 patients and demonstrate this approach for the United States city of Chicago. We used a stochastic compartmental model to simulate SARS-CoV-2 transmission and disease progression, including critical cases that would require intensive care. We calibrated the model using daily COVID-19 ICU and hospital census data between March and August 2020. We projected various possible ICU occupancy trajectories from September 2020 to May 2021 with two possible levels of transmission increase and uncertainty in core model parameters. The effect of combined mitigation measures was modeled as a decrease in the transmission rate that took effect when projected ICU occupancy reached a specified threshold. We found that mitigation did not immediately eliminate the risk of exceeding ICU capacity. Delaying action by 7 days increased the probability of exceeding ICU capacity by 10-60% and this increase could not be counteracted by stronger mitigation. Even under modest transmission increase, a threshold occupancy no higher than 60% was required when mitigation reduced the reproductive number Rt to just below 1. At higher transmission increase, a threshold of at most 40% was required with mitigation that reduced Rt below 0.75 within the first two weeks after mitigation. Our analysis demonstrates a quantitative approach for the selection of ICU occupancy thresholds that considers parameter uncertainty and compares relevant mitigation and transmission scenarios. An appropriate threshold will depend on the location, number of ICU beds available for COVID-19, available mitigation options, feasible mitigation strengths, and tolerated durations of intensified mitigation.

Identifiers

PMID36962179
PMCPMC10021999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC0
measurements read116
identifiers read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.