Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962084›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2021

Female Genital Schistosomiasis (FGS) in Cameroon: A formative epidemiological and socioeconomic investigation in eleven rural fishing communities.

Makia Christine Masong, Godlove Bunda Wepnje, Ntsinda Tchoffo Marlene, Victoria Gamba, Marie-Therese Mengue, Estelle Kouokam, J Russell Stothard, Albert Legrand Same Ekobo

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Makia Christine MasongDepartment of Social Sciences and Management, Catholic University of Central Africa, Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2601-7068
Godlove Bunda WepnjeDepartment of Zoology and Animal Physiology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8335-6624
Ntsinda Tchoffo MarleneDepartment of Social Sciences and Management, Catholic University of Central Africa, Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1871-4381
Victoria GambaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1866-8941
Marie-Therese MengueDepartment of Social Sciences and Management, Catholic University of Central Africa, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Estelle KouokamDepartment of Social Sciences and Management, Catholic University of Central Africa, Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1177-1703
J Russell StothardDepartment of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9370-3420
Albert Legrand Same EkoboDepartment of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University Teaching Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Catholic University of Central Africa · CMLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Buea · CMUniversity of Nairobi · KEUniversity Teaching Hospital of Yaounde · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemale Genital Schistosomiasis (FGS) is most often caused by presence of Schistosoma haematobium eggs lodged in the female reproductive tract which results in chronic fibrosis and scarring. In Cameroon, despite high community prevalences of urine-patent S. haematobium infections, FGS has yet to be studied in depth. To shed light on the clinical prevalence and socioeconomic effects of FGS, we undertook a formative community-based epidemiological and qualitative survey.

methodA cross sectional multidisciplinary study of 304 girls and women from 11 remote rural fishing communities in Cameroon was undertaken using parasitological sampling, clinical colposcopy, and interviews. The lived experiences of those with FGS were documented using a process of ethnography with participant observation and in-depth interviews.

resultAmongst 304 women and girls aged >5 years (Median age: 18; Interquartile range: 9.6-28), 198 females were eligible for FGS testing and 58 adult women were examined by clinical colposcopy. Of these, 34 were positive for FGS (proportion: 58.6%; 95% CI: 45.8-70.4), younger girls showing a higher FGS prevalence, and older women not shedding eggs showing a pattern for cervical lesions from earlier infection. In a subset of women with FGS selected purposively (12/58), in-depth interviews with participant observation revealed out-of-pocket expenditures of up to 500USD related health spending for repeated diagnosis and treatment of gynecological illnesses, and 9 hours daily lost reproductive labour. Psychosocial unrest, loss in social capital, and despair were linked with sub-fertility and persistent vaginal itch.

conclusionWith our first formative evidence on prevalence, socioeconomic effects and experiences of FGS amongst women and girls in Cameroon, we have clarified to a new level of detail the deficit in provision of and access to peripheral health services in remote areas of Cameroon. Using this information, there is now strong evidence for national programs and services on women's health and schistosomiasis to update and revise policies targeted on prevention and management of FGS. We therefore stress the need for regular provision of Praziquantel treatment to adolescent girls and women in S. haematobium endemic areas, alongside better access to tailored diagnostic services that can detect FGS and appropriately triage care at primary health level.

Identifiers

PMID36962084
PMCPMC10022362
OpenAlexW3206272231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read72
identifiers read14
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.