Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36962082›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Characteristics and expectations among emergency department patients in India.

Kevin Davey, Sumin Jacob, Nilesh Prasad, Manjula Shri, Richard Amdur, Janice Blanchard, Jeffrey Smith, Katherine Douglass

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin DaveyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8350-4380
Sumin JacobDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Believer's Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9059-3254
Nilesh PrasadDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Max Super Specialty Hospital Patparganj, Patparganj, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9788-5391
Manjula ShriMeenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Center, Institute of Emergency Medicine, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1237-7871
Richard AmdurDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4900-653X
Janice BlanchardDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7230-2583
Jeffrey SmithDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-4851
Katherine DouglassDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4730-571X
George Washington University · USMax Super Speciality Hospital · INMeenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In India, and many low-middle income countries (LMICs), emergency medicine (EM) remains a poorly defined specialty and an unregulated field of clinical practice. Recognition of the attitudes, understanding, and expectations of patients presenting to Indian EDs will be crucial to the continued development of EM as a specialty. This is a multicenter, prospective, cross sectional study of adult and pediatric patients presenting to the ED in three geographically distinct regions of India. Participants were surveyed about their expectations regarding the type of care that they expected to receive, previous treatment options they have utilized, basic understanding of ED operations, factors contributing to their decision to seek ED care, and basic demographic information. 779 patients were approached to participate in the study, of which 698 (90%) completed the survey. Common ways that patients reported learning about the ED were referral from another healthcare provider (45%) and recommendation by a family member (61%). Participants chose the ED was because they thought they would be seen quickly (89%), would receive acute pain management (45%), their regular outpatient care was closed (45%), or were sent by another doctor (45%). Patients expected to wait 0.3 hours (18 minutes) on average to see a doctor in the ED. Over 75% or patients expected to see a specialist consultant in the ED and 12% expected to see their personal physician. Eighty-five percent of patients were triaged as moderate or high acuity, and 74% of patients were admitted. This study found that ED in India is utilized by a population with an extremely high acuity of medical illness that attempts to access healthcare through multiple avenues. Patients most frequently visit the ED due to a referral from another healthcare provider or family member. Most patients are aware of the existence of the ED, though understanding of available services may be lacking. Future research should focus on community outreach and education initiatives on ED services.

Identifiers

PMID36962082
PMCPMC10021842
OpenAlexW4211044830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read123
identifiers read12
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.