Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961981›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2023

Predicting Response of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Artificial Intelligence Tool.

Savitri Krishnamurthy, Parag Jain, Debu Tripathy, Roland Basset, Ramandeep Randhawa, Hassan Muhammad, Wei Huang, Hua Yang, Shivaani Kummar, George Wilding and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of gynecologic cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Savitri KrishnamurthyUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-9030-4136
Parag JainPathomIQ Inc, Cupertini, CA.
Debu TripathyUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-2404
Roland BassetUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-4534-2042
Ramandeep RandhawaPathomIQ Inc, Cupertini, CA.
Hassan MuhammadPathomIQ Inc, Cupertini, CA.
Wei HuangPathomIQ Inc, Cupertini, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-0813-4188
Hua YangPathomIQ Inc, Cupertini, CA.
Shivaani KummarOregon Health Science University, Portland, OR.ORCID 0000-0001-6906-1627
George WildingPathomIQ Inc, Cupertini, CA.
Rajat RoyPathomIQ Inc, Cupertini, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAchieving a pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is associated with improved patient outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Currently, there are no validated predictive biomarkers for the response to NAC in TNBC. We developed and validated a deep convolutional neural network-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict the response of TNBC to NAC. MATERIALS AND

methodsWhole-slide images (WSIs) of hematoxylin and eosin-stained core biopsies from 165 (pCR in 60 and non-pCR in 105) and 78 (pCR in 31 and non-pCR in 47) patients with TNBC were used to train and validate the model. The model extracts morphometric features from WSIs in an unsupervised manner, thereby generating clusters of morphologically similar patterns. Downstream ranking of clusters provided regions of interest and morphometric scores; a low score close to zero and a high score close to one represented a high or low probability of response to NAC.

resultsThe predictive ability of AI score for the entire cohort of 78 patients with TNBC ascertained by receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75. The AUC for stages I, II, and III disease were 0.88, 0.73, and 0.74, respectively. Using a cutoff value of 0.35, the positive predictive value of the AI score for pCR was 73.7%, and the negative predictive value was 76.2% for non-pCR patients.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate the use of an AI tool on digitized hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue images to predict the response to NAC in patients with TNBC with high accuracy. If validated in subsequent studies, these results may serve as an ancillary aid for individualized therapeutic decisions in patients with TNBC.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceEosine Yellowish-(YS)HematoxylinHumansNeural Networks, ComputerEosine Yellowish-(YS)Hematoxylin

Identifiers

PMID36961981
PMCPMC10530970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.