Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2023
Lung ultrasound for evaluating perioperative atelectasis and aeration in the post-anesthesia care unit.
Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilator exchange on early postoperative atelectasis in patients undergoing prolonged non-intubated anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Ultrasound guided individualized PEEP reduces postoperative atelectasis in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Recruitment maneuvers and lung ultrasound-assessed aeration in laparoscopic cholecystectomy : A prospective randomized controlled trial.Die Anaesthesiologie · 2026Article
- Role of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Inpatient Perioperative Medical Management: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Lung ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for pulmonary consolidation and atelectasis after cardiac surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- ESICM-ESPNIC international expert consensus on quantitative lung ultrasound in intensive care.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Anaesthesia-induced atelectasis in a rat model (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Comparative respiratory outcomes of thoracic spinal versus general anesthesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A retrospective study.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLung ultrasound is widely accepted as a reliable, noninvasive tool for evaluating lung status at the bedside. We assessed the impact of perioperative variables on atelectasis and lung aeration using lung ultrasound, and their correlation with postoperative oxygenation in patients undergoing general anesthesia.
methodsThis prospective observational study evaluated 93 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo elective non-cardiothoracic surgery under general anesthesia. Lung ultrasound was performed 5 min after admission to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Twelve pulmonary quadrants were selected for each ultrasound examination. The lung ultrasound scores and atelectasis status were calculated. The oxygenation assessment was obtained by arterial blood gas analysis before discharge from the PACU.
resultsThirty-two patients (34%) had atelectasis in at least one of the 12 evaluated segments, whereas 12 patients (13%) had atelectasis in at least three segments. The proportion of B-lines (≥ 3) and atelectasis in the inferolateral and posterior regions was significantly higher than in other regions. Patients with lung ultrasound scores ≥ 5 had a higher body mass index and lower PaO
conclusionLung ultrasound enables early postoperative evaluation of atelectasis and lung aeration, which are closely associated with postoperative oxygenation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36961634What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.