Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961546›Full record

ReviewPsychological research2024

A theoretical perspective on action consequences in action imagery: internal prediction as an essential mechanism to detect errors.

Martina Rieger, Shaun G Boe, Tony G J Ingram, Victoria K E Bart, Stephan F Dahm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martina RiegerInstitute for Psychology, UMIT Tirol-Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology, Eduard Wallnöfer Zentrum 1, 6060, Hall in Tyrol, Austria. martina.rieger@umit-tirol.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-296X
Shaun G BoeLaboratory for Brain Recovery and Function, School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7477-0049
Tony G J IngramLaboratory for Brain Recovery and Function, School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-7920
Victoria K E BartInstitute for Psychology, UMIT Tirol-Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology, Eduard Wallnöfer Zentrum 1, 6060, Hall in Tyrol, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-6208
Stephan F DahmInstitute for Psychology, UMIT Tirol-Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology, Eduard Wallnöfer Zentrum 1, 6060, Hall in Tyrol, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6001-6640

Funding

Austrian Science Fund P30488-BBLAustrian Science Fund FWF P 30488Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN/04840-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acting in the environment results in both intended and unintended consequences. Action consequences provide feedback about the adequacy of actions while they are in progress and when they are completed and therefore contribute to monitoring actions, facilitate error detection, and are crucial for motor learning. In action imagery, no actual action takes place, and consequently, no actual action consequences are produced. However, imagined action consequences may replace actual action consequences, serving a similar function and facilitating performance improvements akin to that occurring with actual actions. In this paper, we conceptualize action imagery as a simulation based on internal models. During that simulation, forward models predict action consequences. A comparison of predicted and intended action consequences sometimes indicates the occurrence of action errors (or deviations from optimal performance) in action imagery. We review research indicating that action errors are indeed sometimes imagined in action imagery. These results are compatible with the view that action imagery is based on motor simulation but incompatible with the view that action imagery is solely based on abstract knowledge. The outlined framework seems suitable to cover a wide range of action imagery phenomena and can explain action imagery practice effects.

Indexed as

ImaginationHumansPsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID36961546
PMCPMC7616356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.