Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961518›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2024

Multimodality imaging review of ulnar nerve pathologies.

Ranjit Kumar Chaudhary, Nikitha Karkala, Pankaj Nepal, Elina Gupta, Neeraj Kaur, Prem Batchala, Joshua Sapire, Syed Intkhab Alam

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ranjit Kumar ChaudharyDepartment of Radiology, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2840-0180
Nikitha KarkalaDepartment of Radiology, Northwell North Shore University Hospital, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Queens, NY, USA.
Pankaj NepalDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Elina GuptaDepartment of Radiology, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT, USA.
Neeraj KaurDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.
Prem BatchalaDepartment of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Joshua SapireDepartment of Radiology, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT, USA.
Syed Intkhab AlamDepartment of Radiology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
St. Vincent's Medical Center · USHamad Medical Corporation · QAMassachusetts General Hospital · USNorth Shore University Hospital · USUniversity of Northern British Columbia · CAUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ulnar nerve is the second most commonly entrapped nerve after the median nerve. Although clinical evaluation and electrodiagnostic studies remain widely used for the evaluation of ulnar neuropathy, advancements in imaging have led to increased utilization of these newer / better imaging techniques in the overall management of ulnar neuropathy. Specifically, high-resolution ultrasonography of peripheral nerves as well as MRI has become quite useful in evaluating the ulnar nerve in order to better guide treatment. The caliber and fascicular pattern identified in the normal ulnar nerves are important distinguishing features from ulnar nerve pathology. The cubital tunnel within the elbow and Guyon's canal within the wrist are important sites to evaluate with respect to ulnar nerve compression. Both acute and chronic conditions resulting in deformity, trauma as well as inflammatory conditions may predispose certain patients to ulnar neuropathy. Granulomatous diseases as well as both neurogenic and non-neurogenic tumors can also potentially result in ulnar neuropathy. Tumors around the ulnar nerve can also lead to mass effect on the nerve, particularly in tight spaces like the aforementioned canals. Although high-resolution ultrasonography is a useful modality initially, particularly as it can be helpful for dynamic evaluation, MRI remains most reliable due to its higher resolution. Newer imaging techniques like sonoelastography and microneurography, as well as nerve-specific contrast agents, are currently being investigated for their usefulness and are not routinely being used currently.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsUlnar Nerve Compression SyndromesUlnar NeuropathiesHumansUlnar NerveWristhypothenar hammer syndromemagnetic resonance neurographyperipheral nerve ultrasoundsnapping triceps syndromeulnar nerve imagingulnar nerve leprosyUlnar neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID36961518
PMCPMC10973834
OpenAlexW4360807730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.