Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961483›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2023

Low-Cost Technology-Aided Programs for Supporting People With Motor, Visual, and Intellectual Disabilities in Functional Forms of Occupation and Communication: Proof-of-Concept Study.

Giulio E Lancioni, Nirbhay N Singh, Mark F O'Reilly, Jeff Sigafoos, Gloria Alberti, Valeria Chiariello, Lorenzo Desideri, Serafino Buono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giulio E LancioniDepartment of Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6515-5690
Nirbhay N SinghDepartment of Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-4847
Mark F O'ReillyCollege of Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6433-3475
Jeff SigafoosSchool of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1239-759X
Gloria AlbertiLega F. D'Oro Research Center, Osimo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-2003
Valeria ChiarielloLega F. D'Oro Research Center, Osimo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6809-1821
Lorenzo DesideriAIAS Bologna Onlus, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2091-2907
Serafino BuonoOasi Research Institute - IRCCS, Troina, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3786-3323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with motor, visual, and intellectual disabilities may have serious problems in independently accessing various forms of functional daily occupation and communication.

objectiveThe study was aimed at developing and assessing new, low-cost technology-aided programs to help people with motor or visual-motor and intellectual disabilities independently engage in functional forms of occupation and communication with distant partners.

methodsTwo programs were set up using a smartphone interfaced with a 2-switch device and a tablet interfaced with 2 pressure sensors, respectively. Single-subject research designs were used to assess (1) the first program with 2 participants who were blind, had moderate hand control, and were interested in communicating with distant partners through voice messages; and (2) the second program with 2 participants who possessed functional vision, had no or poor hand control, and were interested in communicating with their partners through video calls. Both programs also supported 2 forms of occupational engagement, that is, choosing and accessing preferred leisure events consisting of songs and music videos, and listening to brief stories about relevant daily topics and answering questions related to those stories.

resultsDuring the baseline phase (when only a conventional smartphone or tablet was available), 2 participants managed sporadic access to leisure or leisure and communication events. The other 2 participants did not show any independent leisure or communication engagement. During the intervention (when the technology-aided programs were used), all participants managed to independently engage in multiple leisure and communication events throughout the sessions and to listen to stories and answer story-related questions.

conclusionsThe findings, which need to be interpreted with caution given the nature of the study and the small number of participants, seem to suggest that the new programs may be viable tools for helping people with motor or visual-motor and intellectual disabilities independently access leisure, communication, and other forms of functional engagement.

Indexed as

communicationintellectual disabilityleisuremotor impairmentsmartphonestoriestablettechnologyvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID36961483
PMCPMC10131918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.