Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961384›Full record

SynthesisMolecular ecology resources2025

The practice and promise of temporal genomics for measuring evolutionary responses to global change.

René D Clark, Katrina A Catalano, Kyra S Fitz, Eric Garcia, Kyle E Jaynes, Brendan N Reid, Allyson Sawkins, Anthony A Snead, John C Whalen, Malin L Pinsky

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ancient DNA from shells reveals delayed genomic erosion and rapid immune adaptation in the critically endangered black abalone.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Museum collections provide a temporal record of past genetic variation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Anthropocene genetic diversity loss in the marine tropics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

René D ClarkDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9874-8863
Katrina A CatalanoDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-4919
Kyra S FitzDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Eric GarciaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
Kyle E JaynesDepartment of Integrative Biology, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4188-0468
Brendan N ReidDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Allyson SawkinsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Anthony A SneadDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5020-8729
John C WhalenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
Malin L PinskyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8523-8952

Funding

National Science Foundation 1764316National Science Foundation OISE-1743711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the evolutionary consequences of anthropogenic change is imperative for estimating long-term species resilience. While contemporary genomic data can provide us with important insights into recent demographic histories, investigating past change using present genomic data alone has limitations. In comparison, temporal genomics studies, defined herein as those that incorporate time series genomic data, utilize museum collections and repeated field sampling to directly examine evolutionary change. As temporal genomics is applied to more systems, species and questions, best practices can be helpful guides to make the most efficient use of limited resources. Here, we conduct a systematic literature review to synthesize the effects of temporal genomics methodology on our ability to detect evolutionary changes. We focus on studies investigating recent change within the past 200 years, highlighting evolutionary processes that have occurred during the past two centuries of accelerated anthropogenic pressure. We first identify the most frequently studied taxa, systems, questions and drivers, before highlighting overlooked areas where further temporal genomic studies may be particularly enlightening. Then, we provide guidelines for future study and sample designs while identifying key considerations that may influence statistical and analytical power. Our aim is to provide recommendations to a broad array of researchers interested in using temporal genomics in their work.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomicsAnimalscontemporary evolutiongenetic monitoringhistorical DNA

Identifiers

PMID36961384
PMCPMC12142728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.