Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961252›Full record

ReviewThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2023

High-dose opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.

Charl Els, Tanya D Jackson, Reidar Hagtvedt, Diane Kunyk, Barend Sonnenberg, Vernon G Lappi, Sebastian Straube

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Editorial to the Special Issue: "Recent Advances in the Management of Chronic Pain".International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charl ElsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Tanya D JacksonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Reidar HagtvedtAccounting and Business Analytics, Alberta School of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Diane KunykFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Barend SonnenbergMedical Services, Workers' Compensation Board - Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Vernon G LappiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Sebastian StraubeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAWorkers Compensation Board of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis overview was originally published in 2017, and is being updated in 2022.  Chronic pain is typically described as pain on most days for at least three months. Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is any chronic pain that is not due to a malignancy. Chronic non-cancer pain in adults is a common and complex clinical issue, for which opioids are prescribed by some physicians for pain management. There are concerns that the use of high doses of opioids for CNCP lacks evidence of effectiveness, and may increase the risk of adverse events.

objectivesTo describe the evidence from Cochrane Reviews and overviews regarding the efficacy and safety of high-dose opioids (defined as 200 mg morphine equivalent or more per day) for CNCP.

methodsWe identified Cochrane Reviews and overviews by searching the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in The Cochrane Library. The date of the last search was 21 July 2022. Two overview authors independently assessed the search results. We planned to analyse data on any opioid agent used at a high dose for two weeks or more for the treatment of CNCP in adults. MAIN

resultsWe did not identify any reviews or overviews that met the inclusion criteria. The excluded reviews largely reflected low doses or titrated doses, where all doses were analysed as a single group; we were unable to extract any data for high-dose use only. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is a critical lack of high-quality evidence, in the form of Cochrane Reviews, about how well high-dose opioids work for the management of CNCP in adults, and regarding the presence and severity of adverse events.  No evidence-based argument can be made on the use of high-dose opioids, i.e. 200 mg morphine equivalent or more daily, in clinical practice. Considering that high-dose opioids have been, and are still being used in clinical practice to treat CNCP, knowing about the efficacy and safety of these higher doses is imperative.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidChronic PainAdultHumansMorphinePain ManagementSystematic Reviews as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidMorphine

Identifiers

PMID36961252
PMCPMC10037930
OpenAlexW4360813937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.