Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961126›Full record

Observational studyActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

Evaluating antenatal risk in twin pregnancies-A feasibility study to identify modifiable factors associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Isabelle Greatholder, Emma Tomlinson, Jack Wilkinson, Lucy E Higgins, Mark D Kilby, Alexander E P Heazell

Abstract readObservational StudyTwin Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabelle GreatholderMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1143-4694
Emma TomlinsonMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jack WilkinsonCentre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Lucy E HigginsMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0993-497X
Mark D KilbyWest Midlands Fetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women's and Children's Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9987-4223
Alexander E P HeazellMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4303-7845

Funding

British Fetal Medicine Society/Twins Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwin pregnancies have significantly higher rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality compared to singleton pregnancies; current attempts to reduce perinatal mortality have been less successful in twin pregnancies. The paucity of information about modifiable risk factors for adverse neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies, as well as independent effects of chorionicity may have contributed to this outcome. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of an observational study to identify modifiable factors associated with adverse neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients pregnant with twins at six UK hospitals between December 2019-March 2021 completed researcher-administered questionnaires at approximately 20-, 28- and 36-weeks' gestation, recording a wide range of self-reported social, lifestyle and demographic factors, alongside prospectively recorded clinical data from maternity records. Descriptive statistics were used to describe frequencies of exposures; logistic regression was used to determine whether factors were associated with a composite measure of adverse neonatal outcome.

resultsData were collected from 65% (181/277) of eligible participants. A total of 98% (175) of participants had positive views about their participation. Some exposures, including cigarette smoking, supine sleep position and reduced fetal movements were less frequent in twin pregnancies compared to singletons, whereas fertility treatment was more common. Furthermore, different patterns of exposure were seen between monochorionic and dichorionic twins. This pilot study found some associations with adverse neonatal outcomes including: low BMI (OR 8.36, 95% CI: 1.02-68.87), maternal age ≥41 years (OR 9.0 95% CI: 1.07-75.84), maternally perceived high-stress levels (OR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.03-3.75) and inadequate antenatal screening (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01-2.06). Sleep duration ≥9 h and right-sided going to sleep position were more frequent among pregnancies with adverse outcomes. Participants who reported receiving no information on fetal movement and reduced maternal perception of movements were more likely to have an adverse outcome, but sample size prohibited analysis based upon chorionicity.

conclusionsAn observational study of modifiable factors in twin pregnancy is feasible. Differences in the frequencies of exposures between twin and singleton pregnancies highlight the need for twin-specific studies to identify modifiable factors and develop preventative strategies for morbidity and mortality in twin pregnancies.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomePregnancy, TwinAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornPilot ProjectsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTwins, Dizygoticfeasibility studymodifiable antenatal risk factorsneonatal morbidity and mortalitytwin pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36961126
PMCPMC10072252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.