Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961089›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2023

Potentially More Out of Reach: Public Reporting Exacerbates Inequities in Home Health Access.

Shekinah A Fashaw-Walters, Momotazur Rahman, Gilbert Gee, Vincent Mor, Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez, Ceron Ford, Kali S Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Landscape of Consensus-Based Entity-Endorsed Perioperative Quality Measures.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shekinah A Fashaw-WaltersSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-0077-5047
Momotazur RahmanCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University.
Gilbert GeeFielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles.
Vincent MorCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University.
Maricruz Rivera-HernandezCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University.
Ceron FordSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota.
Kali S ThomasCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University.

Funding

Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
Disparities in Access to High-Quality Home Health and the Impact of Public ReportingR36AG068199 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI FASHAW-WALTERS, SHEKINAH ANTOINETTE · 2020 to 2020
$53k
NIA NIH HHS R36 AG068199NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy Points Public reporting is associated with both mitigating and exacerbating inequities in high-quality home health agency use for marginalized groups. Ensuring equitable access to home health requires taking a closer look at potentially inequitable policies to ensure that these policies are not inadvertently exacerbating disparities as home health public reporting potentially does. Targeted federal, state, and local interventions should focus on raising awareness about the five-star quality ratings among marginalized populations for whom inequities have been exacerbated. CONTEXT: Literature suggests that public reporting of quality may have the unintended consequence of exacerbating disparities in access to high-quality, long-term care for older adults. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the home health five-star ratings on changes in high-quality home health agency use by race, ethnicity, income status, and place-based factors.

methodsWe use data from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, Medicare Enrollment Files, Care Compare, and American Community Survey to estimate differential access to high-quality home health agencies between July 2014 and June 2017. To estimate the impact of the home health five-star rating introduction on the use of high-quality home health agencies, we use a longitudinal observational pretest-posttest design.

findingsAfter the introduction of the home health five-star ratings in 2016, we found that adjusted rates of high-quality home health agency use increased for all home health patients, except for Hispanic/Latine and Asian American/Pacific Islander patients. Additionally, we found that the disparity in high-quality home health agency use between low-income and higher-income home health patients was exacerbated after the introduction of the five-star quality ratings. We also observed that patients within predominantly Hispanic/Latine neighborhoods had a significant decrease in their use of high-quality home health agencies, whereas patients in predominantly White and integrated neighborhoods had a significant increase in high-quality home health agency use. Other neighborhoods experience a nonsignificant change in high-quality home health agency use.

conclusionsPolicymakers should be aware of the potential unintended consequences for implementing home health public reporting, specifically for Hispanic/Latine, Asian American/Pacific Islander, and low-income home health patients, as well as patients residing in predominantly Hispanic/Latine neighborhoods. Targeted interventions should focus on raising awareness around the five-star ratings.

Indexed as

EthnicityMedicareAgedAsian American Native Hawaiian and Pacific IslanderHispanic or LatinoHumansIncomeUnited Statesaccesshome healthpublic reportingqualityracial inequities

Identifiers

PMID36961089
PMCPMC10262386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.