Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961055›Full record

ReviewClinics and practice2023

Carcinogenic Effects of Areca Nut and Its Metabolites: A Review of the Experimental Evidence.

Kalpani Senevirathna, Roshan Pradeep, Yovanthi Anurangi Jayasinghe, Shalindu Malshan Jayawickrama, Rasika Illeperuma, Saman Warnakulasuriya, Ruwan Duminda Jayasinghe

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Therapeutic Potential of Methanolic Extract ofJournal of pharmacopuncture · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Neuroprotective Effects and Mechanisms of Arecoline Against HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kalpani SenevirathnaCentre for Research in Oral Cancer (CROC), Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0001-5768-1351
Roshan PradeepCentre for Research in Oral Cancer (CROC), Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0002-2734-8248
Yovanthi Anurangi JayasingheCentre for Research in Oral Cancer (CROC), Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0001-5144-5550
Shalindu Malshan JayawickramaCentre for Research in Oral Cancer (CROC), Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0003-4582-4006
Rasika IlleperumaCentre for Research in Oral Cancer (CROC), Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0001-5506-0981
Saman WarnakulasuriyaFaculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College, London SE1 9RA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2103-0746
Ruwan Duminda JayasingheCentre for Research in Oral Cancer (CROC), Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0002-8054-4301
University of Peradeniya · LKKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral cancers (OC) are among the most frequent malignancies encountered in Southeast Asia, primarily due to the prevalent habit of betel quid (BQ) and smokeless tobacco use in this region. Areca nut (AN), the primary ingredient in BQ, contains several alkaloids, including arecoline, arecaidine, guvacoline, and guvacine. These have been associated with both the AN abuse liability and carcinogenicity. Additionally, variations in AN alkaloid levels could lead to differences in the addictiveness and carcinogenic potential across various AN-containing products. Recent studies based on animal models and in vitro experiments show cellular and molecular effects induced by AN. These comprise promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition, autophagy initiation, tissue hypoxia, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and cell death. Further, clinical research endorses these undesired harmful effects in humans. Oral submucosal fibrosis, a potentially malignant disease of the oral cavity, is predominantly reported from the geographical areas of the globe where AN is habitually chewed. OC in chronic AN users presents a more aggressive phenotype, such as resistance to anti-cancer drugs. The available evidence on the carcinogenicity of AN based on the findings reported in the recently published experimental studies is discussed in the present review.

Indexed as

areca nutcarcinogenicitycytotoxicitygenotoxicityin vivo and in vitro studiesoral cancer

Identifiers

PMID36961055
PMCPMC10037666
OpenAlexW4321457486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read3
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.