Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961019›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Optimization of the Danish National Electronic Prescribing System to Improve Patient Safety: Development of a User-Friendly Prototype of the Digital Platform Shared Medication Record.

Anissa Aharaz, Cecillie Louise Kejser, Mille Wilhjelm Poulsen, Sara Jeftic, Aisha Isabella Ulstrup-Hansen, Lillian Mørch Jørgensen, Esben Iversen, Anne Mette Thorhauge, Morten Baltzer Houlind

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anissa AharazThe Capital Region Pharmacy, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Cecillie Louise KejserDepartment of Communication, University of Copenhagen, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mille Wilhjelm PoulsenDepartment of Communication, University of Copenhagen, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sara JefticDepartment of Communication, University of Copenhagen, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Aisha Isabella Ulstrup-HansenDepartment of Communication, University of Copenhagen, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lillian Mørch JørgensenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0199-1577
Esben IversenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne Mette ThorhaugeDepartment of Communication, University of Copenhagen, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten Baltzer HoulindThe Capital Region Pharmacy, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4058-3012
University of Copenhagen · DKAmager Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study uses a participatory design to develop a user-friendly prototype of the current Danish digital platform, Shared Medication Record (SMR), to improve patient safety and minimize medication errors for patients with multimorbidity. A fundamental challenge for medication prescribing is the lack of access to an accurate medication list, which impairs effective communication between healthcare professionals and increases the risk of medication errors. We used a participatory design to identify the major problems with the existing SMR and develop a prototype for a redesigned SMR that addresses these problems. We argue that this prototype will improve communication between healthcare providers, promote patient involvement in their own care, and ultimately reduce medication errors related to the SMR. Moreover, we argue that the participatory design with its emphasis on user involvement and design iterations is a strong approach when designing IT solutions for complex problems in healthcare.

Indexed as

digitalizationhealthcare sectormedication errormultimorbiditypatient safetysector transition

Identifiers

PMID36961019
PMCPMC10037631
OpenAlexW4321597933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.