Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961011›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023

Using Deep-Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Technique to Automatically Evaluate the Collateral Status of Multiphase CTA in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Chun-Chao Huang, Hsin-Fan Chiang, Cheng-Chih Hsieh, Chao-Liang Chou, Zong-Yi Jhou, Ting-Yi Hou, Jin-Siang Shaw

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chun-Chao HuangDepartment of Radiology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104217, Taiwan.
Hsin-Fan ChiangDepartment of Radiology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104217, Taiwan.
Cheng-Chih HsiehDepartment of Radiology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104217, Taiwan.
Chao-Liang ChouDepartment of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City 252005, Taiwan.
Zong-Yi JhouInstitute of Mechatronic Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan.
Ting-Yi HouInstitute of Mechatronic Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan.
Jin-Siang ShawInstitute of Mechatronic Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8329-9452
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWNational Taipei University of Technology · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollateral status is an important predictor for the outcome of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Multiphase computed-tomography angiography (mCTA) is useful to evaluate the collateral status, but visual evaluation of this examination is time-consuming. This study aims to use an artificial intelligence (AI) technique to develop an automatic AI prediction model for the collateral status of mCTA.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled subjects with acute ischemic stroke receiving endovascular thrombectomy between January 2015 and June 2020 in a tertiary referral hospital. The demographic data and images of mCTA were collected. The collateral status of all mCTA was visually evaluated. Images at the basal ganglion and supraganglion levels of mCTA were selected to produce AI models using the convolutional neural network (CNN) technique to automatically predict the collateral status of mCTA.

resultsA total of 82 subjects were enrolled. There were 57 cases randomly selected for the training group and 25 cases for the validation group. In the training group, there were 40 cases with a positive collateral result (good or intermediate) and 17 cases with a negative collateral result (poor). In the validation group, there were 21 cases with a positive collateral result and 4 cases with a negative collateral result. During training for the CNN prediction model, the accuracy of the training group could reach 0.999 ± 0.015, whereas the prediction model had a performance of 0.746 ± 0.008 accuracy on the validation group. The area under the ROC curve was 0.7.

conclusionsThis study suggests that the application of the AI model derived from mCTA images to automatically evaluate the collateral status is feasible.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaDeep LearningIschemic StrokeStrokeAngiographyArtificial IntelligenceHumansRetrospective Studiesacute ischemic strokeartificial intelligencecollateral statusconvolutional neural networkmultiphase CTA

Identifiers

PMID36961011
PMCPMC10037617
OpenAlexW4327621021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read34
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.