Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961009›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023

Comparing Radiation Dose of Cerebral Angiography Using Conventional and High kV Techniques: A Retrospective Study on Intracranial Aneurysm Patients and a Phantom Study.

Woranan Kirisattayakul, Panuwat Pattum, Waranon Munkong, Thawatchai Prabsattroo, Chonnatcha Khottapat, Tanyalak Chomkhunthod, Vithit Pungkun

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Woranan KirisattayakulDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5330-9421
Panuwat PattumDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Waranon MunkongDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Thawatchai PrabsattrooDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6292-9040
Chonnatcha KhottapatDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Tanyalak ChomkhunthodDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Vithit PungkunOffice of Atoms for Peace, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of patient radiation dose after the implementation of a high kV technique during a cerebral angiographic procedure is an important issue. This study aimed to determine and compare the patient radiation dose of intracranial aneurysm patients undergoing cerebral angiography using the conventional and high kV techniques in a retrospective study and a phantom study. A total of 122 cases (61 cases with conventional technique and 61 cases with high kV technique) of intracranial aneurysm patients, who underwent cerebral angiographic procedure and met the inclusion criteria, were recruited. The radiation dose and the angiographic exposure parameters were reviewed retrospectively. The radiation dose in the phantom study was conducted using nanoDot

Indexed as

Intracranial AneurysmCerebral AngiographyHumansPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageRetrospective Studiesaneurysm diagnosiscerebral angiographyhigh kVoptically stimulating luminescence dosimeterradiation dose

Identifiers

PMID36961009
PMCPMC10037658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read12
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.