Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36960474›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiographic screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction and mortality risk prediction.

Yu-Chang Huang, Yu-Chun Hsu, Zhi-Yong Liu, Ching-Heng Lin, Richard Tsai, Jung-Sheng Chen, Po-Cheng Chang, Hao-Tien Liu, Wen-Chen Lee, Hung-Ta Wo and 4 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Chang HuangDivision of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yu-Chun HsuCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Zhi-Yong LiuCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ching-Heng LinCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Richard TsaiCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Jung-Sheng ChenCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Po-Cheng ChangDivision of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hao-Tien LiuDivision of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wen-Chen LeeDivision of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hung-Ta WoDivision of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chung-Chuan ChouDivision of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chun-Chieh WangDivision of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ming-Shien WenDivision of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chang-Fu KuoCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) characterized by a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with adverse patient outcomes. We aimed to build a deep neural network (DNN)-based model using standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) to screen for LVSD and stratify patient prognosis. Methods: This retrospective chart review study was conducted using data from consecutive adults who underwent ECG examinations at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan between October 2007 and December 2019. DNN models were developed to recognize LVSD, defined as LVEF <40%, using original ECG signals or transformed images from 190,359 patients with paired ECG and echocardiogram within 14 days. The 190,359 patients were divided into a training set of 133,225 and a validation set of 57,134. The accuracy of recognizing LVSD and subsequent mortality predictions were tested using ECGs from 190,316 patients with paired data. Of these 190,316 patients, we further selected 49,564 patients with multiple echocardiographic data to predict LVSD incidence. We additionally used data from 1,194,982 patients who underwent ECG only to assess mortality prognostication. External validation was performed using data of 91,425 patients from Tri-Service General Hospital, Taiwan. Results: The mean age of patients in the testing dataset was 63.7 ± 16.3 years (46.3% women), and 8,216 patients (4.3%) had LVSD. The median follow-up period was 3.9 years (interquartile range 1.5-7.9 years). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity of the signal-based DNN (DNN-signal) to identify LVSD were 0.95, 0.91, and 0.86, respectively. DNN signal-predicted LVSD was associated with age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.53-2.62) for all-cause mortality and 6.09 (5.83-6.37) for cardiovascular mortality. In patients with multiple echocardiograms, a positive DNN prediction in patients with preserved LVEF was associated with an adjusted HR (95% CI) of 8.33 (7.71 to 9.00) for incident LVSD. Signal- and image-based DNNs performed equally well in the primary and additional datasets. Conclusion: Using DNNs, ECG becomes a low-cost, clinically feasible tool to screen LVSD and facilitate accurate prognostication.

Indexed as

all-cause mortalitydeep neural networkelectrocardiogramleft ventricular ejection fractionleft ventricular systolic dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID36960474
PMCPMC10029758
OpenAlexW4323045943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read64
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.