Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36960465›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2023

Low Back Pain Patients' Perceptions Regarding Their Own Radiology Reports: Pre-Intervention Survey.

Gilad J Regev, Roi Treister, Silviu Brill, Dror Ofir, Khalil Salame, Zvi Lidar, Morsi Khashan, Rivka Litvin, Uri Hochberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gilad J RegevSpine Surgery Unit, Neurosurgical Department, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Roi TreisterThe Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Silviu BrillSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7150-5821
Dror OfirSpine Surgery Unit, Neurosurgical Department, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Khalil SalameSpine Surgery Unit, Neurosurgical Department, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Zvi LidarSpine Surgery Unit, Neurosurgical Department, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Morsi KhashanSpine Surgery Unit, Neurosurgical Department, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Rivka LitvinDepartment of surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Uri HochbergSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: While advanced medical technology and unlimited access to medical information might benefit and empower patients, these same advantages may pose some risks, especially in the cases where patients have direct access to advanced imaging studies. The aim of this work was to evaluate three domains related to patients with lower back pain: the patients' perceptions, misconceptions and the experience of anxiety-related symptoms following direct access to their thoraco-lumbar spine radiology report. An additional aim was the assessment of possible associations with catastrophization. Patients and Methods: Patients who were referred to the spine clinic, following the completion of a CT or MRI of their thoraco-lumbar spine were surveyed. Patient perceptions of the importance of having direct access to their imaging report and of the concern they attribute to the medical terms found in their report were evaluated using a set of questionnaires. The medical terms severity scores were then correlated to a reference clinical score created for the same medical terms by spine surgeons. Lastly, patients' anxiety-related symptoms and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) after reading their radiology report were evaluated. Results: Data from 162 participants (44.6% female), with mean age of 53.1 ± 15.6 years, were collected. Sixty-three percent of the patients stated that reading their report helped them gain better understanding of their medical condition and 84% agreed that having early access to the report helped improve communication with the physician. Patients' degree of concern associated with the medical terms in their imaging report ranged between 2.07 and 3.75, on a scale of 1-5. The patient's degree of concerns were significantly higher for six common medical terms and significantly lower in one, when compared to experts' opinions. A mean (± SD) of 2.86±2.79 anxiety-related symptoms was reported. The mean Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PSC) score was 29.18 ±11.86, ranging from 2 to 52. Both the degree of concerns and the number of symptoms reported were significantly associated with the PCS. Conclusion: Direct access to radiology reports might provoke anxiety symptoms, especially in patients with a tendency for catastrophic thinking. Increasing awareness amongst spine clinicians and radiologist about possible risks associated with direct access to radiology reports could contribute to preventing patients' misconceptions and unnecessary anxiety-related symptoms.

Indexed as

anxietylow back painpain catastrophizingradiology reports

Identifiers

PMID36960465
PMCPMC10029370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.