ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2023
Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking?
Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attitudes of medical and life sciences university students and postdoctoral fellows toward AI chatbots in education: an international cross-sectional survey.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Academic misconduct and artificial intelligence use by medical students, interns and PhD students in Ukraine: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- "ChatGPT says no": agency, trust, and blame in Twitter discourses after the launch of ChatGPT.AI and ethics · 2025Article
- AI detectors are poor western blot classifiers: a study of accuracy and predictive values.PeerJ · 2025Article
- The Surge of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Scientific Writing: Who Will Hold the Rudder, You or AI?Hip & pelvis · 2024Article
- Student skills need to evolve to match our new AI society.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for using large language models in science, version 1.0.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- The opportunities and challenges of adopting ChatGPT in medical research.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre-trained transformer.Frontiers in big data · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent emergence of ChatGPT has led to multiple considerations and discussions regarding the ethics and usage of AI. In particular, the potential exploitation in the educational realm must be considered, future-proofing curriculum for the inevitable wave of AI-assisted assignments. Here, Brent Anders discusses some of the key issues and concerns.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.