Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36960275›Full record

ReviewMRS bulletin2023

Next-generation intelligent laboratories for materials design and manufacturing.

Xiting Peng, Xiaonan Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MRS bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiting PengDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7111-8458
Xiaonan WangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9775-2417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contradiction between the importance of materials to modern society and their slow development process has led to the development of multiple methods to accelerate materials discovery. The recently emerged concept of intelligent laboratories integrates the developments in fields of high-throughput experimentation, automation, theoretical computing, and artificial intelligence to form a system that can autonomously carry out designed experiments and make scientific discoveries. We present the basic concepts and the foundations of this new research paradigm, demonstrate its typical application scenarios through case studies, and envision a collaborative human-machine meta laboratory in the future. Graphical Abstract:

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAutonomousIntelligent laboratoryMachine learningMaterials discovery

Identifiers

PMID36960275
PMCPMC9970134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.