ArticleHealth equity2023
Global Health Equity Requires Global Equity.
Article in Health equity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The arts for disease prevention and health promotion: a systematic review.Nature medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Addressing Barriers to Health Care Access and Their Impact on Social Cohesion Among Rohingya Refugees and Host Community in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Why does hepatitis B remain underprioritized? A view through lived experience.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Embracing complexity and innovation to tackle the social determinants of health.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Addressing global health equity through Global Collaborative Evidence Networks: a narrative literature review of governance models, power and participation.Globalization and health · 2026Review
- Article
- Establishing criteria and distributing conference grants for participants from the Global South: experiences from the Canadian Conference on Global Health 2024.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Progress and inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding among women in Sierra Leone, 2008-2019.International breastfeeding journal · 2025Article
- Missed Nuances in Tuberculosis Research: Reflections from a Tibetan Scholar.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2025Article
- Telemedicine expands cardiovascular care in China - lessons for health equity in the United States.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Solidarity and its decoloniality in global health ethics.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Reimagining global health scholarship to tackle health inequities.SSM - population health · 2024Article
- Neurological disorders in pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries-Management gaps, impacts, and future prospects: A review perspective.Women's health (London, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many global health challenges are characterized by the inequitable patterning of their health and economic consequences, which are etched along the lines of pre-existing inequalities in resources, power, and opportunity. These links require us to reconsider how we define global health equity, and what we consider as most consequential in its pursuit. In this article, we discuss the extent to which improving underlying global equity is an essential prerequisite to global health equity. We conclude that if we are to improve global health equity, there is a need to focus more on foundational-rather than proximal-causes of ill health and propose ways in which this can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.