Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36960139›Full record

ReviewAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2023

Neonatal and paediatric point-of-care ultrasound review.

Stephanie Pan, Carole Lin, Ban C H Tsui

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06443424 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Assessment of Pediatric Challenging Airway and Endotracheal Tube Sizing Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound Versus Traditional Methods in Elective Surgeries

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorZagazig UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled101ConditionsAirway Complication of AnesthesiaArmsultrasound device
NCT07555080 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Gastric Volume Changes Via Ultrasound After Ventilation With Endotracheal Tube, First-Generation Supraglottic Airway, and Second-Generation Supraglottic Airway in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIstanbul UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled250ConditionsGastric Ultrasonography, Supraglottic Airways, Supraglottic Airway Use in Children, Gastric Volume
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Don't Skip the Color: Emergency Department Neonatal Point-of-Care Ultrasound Diagnosis.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie PanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine 300 Pasteur Drive Palo Alto California 94305 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9586-4834
Carole LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine 300 Pasteur Drive Palo Alto California 94305 USA.
Ban C H TsuiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine 300 Pasteur Drive Palo Alto California 94305 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6984-5998
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) examinations for children and newborns are different from POCUS exams for adults due to dissimilarities in size and body composition, as well as distinct surgical procedures and pathologies in the paediatric patient. This review describes the major paediatric POCUS exams and how to perform them and summarizes the current evidence-based perioperative applications of POCUS in paediatric and neonatal patients. Method: Literature searches using PubMed and Google Scholar databases for the period from January 2000 to November 2021 that included MeSH headings of [ultrasonography] and [point of care systems] and keywords including "ultrasound" for studies involving children aged 0 to 18 years. Results: Paediatric and neonatal POCUS exams can evaluate airway, gastric, pulmonary, cardiac, abdominal, vascular, and cerebral systems. Discussion: POCUS is rapidly expanding in its utility and presence in the perioperative care of paediatric and neonatal patients as their anatomy and pathophysiology are uniquely suited for ultrasound imaging applications that extend beyond the standard adult POCUS exams. Conclusions: Paediatric POCUS is a powerful adjunct that complements and augments clinical diagnostic evaluation and treatment.

Indexed as

childrenneonatepaediatricPOCUSpoint‐of‐care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36960139
PMCPMC10030095
OpenAlexW4304893135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.