ArticleEuroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology
Clinical Characteristics and Comparison of Different Prognostic Scores in Wilson's Disease.
Article in Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of oral health status and factors influencing DMFT scores in patients with Wilson's disease: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Isolated neurological symptoms of Wilson's disease manifesting as focal epileptic seizures without hepatic involvement: Insights from a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- The history of Wilson disease.Clinical liver diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Wilson's disease (WD) is a rare autosomal recessive disease, that can involve any organ of the body, the main ones being the liver and the brain. These patients can have varied presentations, ranging from having no symptoms to having neurological manifestations to features of chronic liver disease (CLD). Those patients that end up having CLD are prognosticated Materials and methods: Our study involved 65 patients with WD, comprising both the pediatric and the adult population. We aimed at evaluating the clinical manifestations the lab parameters and the management of these patients. Furthermore, we tried validating the Nazar and the Dhawan score and later compared them with the CTP and the MELD score, which are well-known prognostic tools in CLD. Results: Our patients were subdivided into the pediatric (more than 50%) and the adult group. The most common presenting complaint noted in both groups was abdominal distension. Values of the urine copper and serum ceruloplasmin did not defer between the pediatric and adult patients. Hepatic involvement is frequently seen in the pediatric age-group. Also, CTP class C was chiefly seen in pediatrics 17/33 (51.5%), while CTP class B was in adults 13/32 (40.6%). The mean Nazar score was 3 ± 3, while the mean Dhawan score was 5 ± 4. The main treatment offered for both groups was zinc along with penicillamine. Conclusion: Our study showed the Dhawan score was comparable to the CTP and the MELD score in terms of predicting the disease severity of WD in our patient population. How to cite this article: Majid Z, Abrar G, Laeeq SM,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.