Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959982›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2023

Simulated-to-real benchmarking of acquisition methods in untargeted metabolomics.

Joe Wandy, Ross McBride, Simon Rogers, Nikolaos Terzis, Stefan Weidt, Justin J J van der Hooft, Kevin Bryson, Rónán Daly, Vinny Davies

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joe WandyGlasgow Polyomics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Ross McBrideSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Simon RogersSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Nikolaos TerzisSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Stefan WeidtGlasgow Polyomics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Justin J J van der HooftBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Kevin BrysonSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Rónán DalyGlasgow Polyomics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Vinny DaviesSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
University of Glasgow · GBWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data-Dependent and Data-Independent Acquisition modes (DDA and DIA, respectively) are both widely used to acquire MS2 spectra in untargeted liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) metabolomics analyses. Despite their wide use, little work has been attempted to systematically compare their MS/MS spectral annotation performance in untargeted settings due to the lack of ground truth and the costs involved in running a large number of acquisitions. Here, we present a systematic

Indexed as

data-dependent acquisitiondata independent acquisitiondigital twinliquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometrymetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID36959982
PMCPMC10027714
OpenAlexW4323363993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read14
measurements read70
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.