Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959952›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2023

Oncofertility research pitfall? Recall bias in young adult cancer survivors.

Esther H Chung, Sloane Mebane, Benjamin S Harris, Erin White, Kelly S Acharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Esther H ChungStanford Fertility and Reproductive Health Services, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Sunnyvale.
Sloane MebaneDuke Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Benjamin S HarrisShady Grove Fertility, Jones Institute, Eastern Virginal Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
Erin WhiteDuke Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Kelly S AcharyaStanford Fertility and Reproductive Health Services, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Sunnyvale.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess recall bias by evaluating how well female cancer survivors remember details regarding their cancer diagnosis, treatment, and fertility preservation (FP) counseling.Oncofertility literature cites recall bias as a pitfall of retrospective surveys, but limited data exist to quantify this bias. Design: Retrospective secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data. Setting: Single academic medical center. Patients: Female oncology patients of reproductive age, 18-44 years old, at least 6 months past their last chemotherapy treatment. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Recall of details surrounding cancer diagnosis and chemotherapy regimens, recall of FP counseling and ovarian reserve testing, and rates of chart-documented FP counseling. Results: In total, 117 patients completed the survey, with 112 verified via chart review. When asked to report the chemotherapy regimen, 57% (64 of the 112) marked "I don't know/prefer not to say." Regarding FP, 80% (90 of the 112) denied being offered counseling. Of the 37 (33%) who had documented FP conversations, 13 (35%) did not recall mention of fertility. Only 2 of 8 patients with ovarian reserve testing recalled this being performed at their initial visit. Multivariable logistic regression revealed older age was significantly associated with not being offered FP (odds ratio [OR] 0.87). Conclusions: Our results confirm that the accuracy of oncology patients' reporting is limited by a poor recall, particularly regarding their specific chemotherapy regimen. More than 1 in 3 patients documented to have been offered FP counseling do not recall this discussion. Importantly, only one-third of cancer survivors had chart-documented FP counseling. Increased efforts are needed to ensure adequate follow-up beyond the initial visit.

Indexed as

cancercounselingfertility preservationoncofertilityrecall bias

Identifiers

PMID36959952
PMCPMC10028472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.