Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959945›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Phylogenomic analyses of Sapindales support new family relationships, rapid Mid-Cretaceous Hothouse diversification, and heterogeneous histories of gene duplication.

Elizabeth M Joyce, Marc S Appelhans, Sven Buerki, Martin Cheek, Jurriaan M de Vos, José R Pirani, Alexandre R Zuntini, Julien B Bachelier, Michael J Bayly, Martin W Callmander and 20 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Unraveling the Ancient Introgression History ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Phylogenomic study ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  14. Towards a monophyleticPhytoKeys · 2025
    Article
  15. Australian Rainforests-A Living Museum of Natural Product Chemical Diversity.Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The complete chloroplast genome of Marupa (Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Elizabeth M JoyceSystematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of Plants, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Marc S AppelhansDepartment of Systematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of Plants, University of Göttingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Sven BuerkiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States.
Martin CheekRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
Jurriaan M de VosDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
José R PiraniDepartamento de Botaênica, Universidade de Saão Paulo, Herbário SPF, Saão Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre R ZuntiniRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
Julien B BachelierInstitut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael J BaylySchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Martin W CallmanderConservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marcelo F DevecchiDepartamento de Botaênica, Universidade de Saão Paulo, Herbário SPF, Saão Paulo, Brazil.
Susan K PellUnited States Botanic Garden, Washington, DC, United States.
Milton GroppoDepartamento de Botaênica, Universidade de Saão Paulo, Herbário SPF, Saão Paulo, Brazil.
Porter P LowryMissouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, United States.
John MitchellNew York Botanical Garden, New York, NY, United States.
Carolina M SiniscalchiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Harned Hall, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, United States.
Jérôme MunzingerAMAP, Université Montpellier, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRAE), Montpellier, France.
Harvey K OrelSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Caroline M PannellRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
Lars NauheimerCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia.
Hervé SauquetNational Herbarium of New South Wales (NSW), Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andrea WeeksDepartment of Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Alexandra N Muellner-RiehlDepartment of Molecular Evolution and Plant Systematics & Herbarium, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Ilia J LeitchRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
Olivier MaurinRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
Félix ForestRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
Katharina NargarAustralian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia.
Kevin R ThieleSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
William J BakerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
Darren M CraynCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sapindales is an angiosperm order of high economic and ecological value comprising nine families, c. 479 genera, and c. 6570 species. However, family and subfamily relationships in Sapindales remain unclear, making reconstruction of the order's spatio-temporal and morphological evolution difficult. In this study, we used Angiosperms353 target capture data to generate the most densely sampled phylogenetic trees of Sapindales to date, with 448 samples and c. 85% of genera represented. The percentage of paralogous loci and allele divergence was characterized across the phylogeny, which was time-calibrated using 29 rigorously assessed fossil calibrations. All families were supported as monophyletic. Two core family clades subdivide the order, the first comprising Kirkiaceae, Burseraceae, and Anacardiaceae, the second comprising Simaroubaceae, Meliaceae, and Rutaceae. Kirkiaceae is sister to Burseraceae and Anacardiaceae, and, contrary to current understanding, Simaroubaceae is sister to Meliaceae and Rutaceae. Sapindaceae is placed with Nitrariaceae and Biebersteiniaceae as sister to the core Sapindales families, but the relationships between these families remain unclear, likely due to their rapid and ancient diversification. Sapindales families emerged in rapid succession, coincident with the climatic change of the Mid-Cretaceous Hothouse event. Subfamily and tribal relationships within the major families need revision, particularly in Sapindaceae, Rutaceae and Meliaceae. Much of the difficulty in reconstructing relationships at this level may be caused by the prevalence of paralogous loci, particularly in Meliaceae and Rutaceae, that are likely indicative of ancient gene duplication events such as hybridization and polyploidization playing a role in the evolutionary history of these families. This study provides key insights into factors that may affect phylogenetic reconstructions in Sapindales across multiple scales, and provides a state-of-the-art phylogenetic framework for further research.

Indexed as

Cenomanian-Turonian Thermal MaximumHybSeqparalogyphylogenomicssequence capturetarget enrichment

Identifiers

PMID36959945
PMCPMC10028101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read60
reference markers read66
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.