Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959840›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2023

Machine Learning Hybrid Model for the Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Hira Khalid, Ajab Khan, Muhammad Zahid Khan, Gulzar Mehmood, Muhammad Shuaib Qureshi

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hira KhalidDepartment of Information Technology, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Havelian 22500, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Ajab KhanDepartment of Information Technology, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Havelian 22500, Abbottabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3542-2639
Muhammad Zahid KhanDepartment of Computer Science and I.T, Network Systems and Security Research Group, University of Malakand, Chakdara 18800, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1171-1794
Gulzar MehmoodDepartment of Computer Science, IQRA National University, Swat Campus 19220, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4216-1246
Muhammad Shuaib QureshiDepartment of Computer Science, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-6302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To diagnose an illness in healthcare, doctors typically conduct physical exams and review the patient's medical history, followed by diagnostic tests and procedures to determine the underlying cause of symptoms. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is currently the leading cause of death, with a rapidly increasing number of patients, resulting in 1.7 million deaths annually. While various diagnostic methods are available, this study utilizes machine learning due to its high accuracy. In this study, we have used the hybrid technique to build our proposed model. In our proposed model, we have used the Pearson correlation for feature selection. In the first step, the best models were selected on the basis of critical literature analysis. In the second step, the combination of these models is used in our proposed hybrid model. Gaussian Naïve Bayes, gradient boosting, and decision tree classifier are used as a base classifier, and the random forest classifier is used as a meta-classifier in the proposed hybrid model. The objective of this study is to evaluate the best machine learning classification techniques and identify the best-used machine learning classifier in terms of accuracy. This provides a solution for overfitting and achieves the highest accuracy. It also highlights some of the challenges that affect the result of better performance. In this study, we critically review the existing available machine learning classification techniques. We evaluate in terms of accuracy, and a comprehensive analytical evaluation of the related work is presented with a tabular system. In implementation, we have used the top four models and built a hybrid model using UCI chronic kidney disease dataset for prediction. Gradient boosting achieves around 99% accuracy, random forest achieves 98%, decision tree classifier achieves 96% accuracy, and our proposed hybrid model performs best getting 100% accuracy on the same dataset. Some of the main machine learning algorithms used to predict the occurrence of CKD are Naïve Bayes, decision tree, K-nearest neighbor, random forest, support vector machine, LDA, GB, and neural network. In this study, we apply GB (gradient boosting), Gaussian Naïve Bayes, and decision tree along with random forest on the same set of features and compare the accuracy score.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningBayes TheoremHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRandom ForestSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID36959840
PMCPMC10030216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read16
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.