ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2023
Machine Learning Hybrid Model for the Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Advanced applications in chronic disease monitoring using IoT mobile sensing device data, machine learning algorithms and frame theory: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in predicting chronic kidney disease prognosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Renal failure · 2024Pooled it
- Hierarchical contrastive learning from GP-recorded and eGFR labels for CKD staging.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Toward Explainable Precision Nephrology: Machine Learning-Based Chronic Kidney Disease Prediction.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Data-driven explainable chronic kidney disease detection using RF based data imputation and meta-ensemble learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of an AI-based prediction model for chronic kidney disease after cardiac surgery.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Article
- Recent advancements and future prospects on AI-integrated sensing techniques for non-invasive chronic kidney disease diagnosis: a review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Protocol for an Integrative Meta-Analysis of the Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Prediction of Chronic Disease Risks and Outcomes.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Monitoring kidney microanatomy during ischemia-reperfusion using ANFIS optimized CNN.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Application of machine learning for early detection of chronic diseases in Africa.Journal of public health research · 2025Article
- Cyclical hybrid imputation technique for missing values in data sets.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning for classifying chronic kidney disease and predicting creatinine levels using at-home measurements.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrating multimodal imaging and peritumoral features for enhanced prostate cancer diagnosis: A machine learning approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- An explainable multi-objective hybrid machine learning model for reducing heart failure mortality.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a computable phenotype for Turner syndrome utilizing electronic health records from a national pediatric network.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2024Article
- Unlocking Precision Medicine for Prognosis of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Establishment and comparison of prediction models for early-stage diabetic kidney disease.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To diagnose an illness in healthcare, doctors typically conduct physical exams and review the patient's medical history, followed by diagnostic tests and procedures to determine the underlying cause of symptoms. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is currently the leading cause of death, with a rapidly increasing number of patients, resulting in 1.7 million deaths annually. While various diagnostic methods are available, this study utilizes machine learning due to its high accuracy. In this study, we have used the hybrid technique to build our proposed model. In our proposed model, we have used the Pearson correlation for feature selection. In the first step, the best models were selected on the basis of critical literature analysis. In the second step, the combination of these models is used in our proposed hybrid model. Gaussian Naïve Bayes, gradient boosting, and decision tree classifier are used as a base classifier, and the random forest classifier is used as a meta-classifier in the proposed hybrid model. The objective of this study is to evaluate the best machine learning classification techniques and identify the best-used machine learning classifier in terms of accuracy. This provides a solution for overfitting and achieves the highest accuracy. It also highlights some of the challenges that affect the result of better performance. In this study, we critically review the existing available machine learning classification techniques. We evaluate in terms of accuracy, and a comprehensive analytical evaluation of the related work is presented with a tabular system. In implementation, we have used the top four models and built a hybrid model using UCI chronic kidney disease dataset for prediction. Gradient boosting achieves around 99% accuracy, random forest achieves 98%, decision tree classifier achieves 96% accuracy, and our proposed hybrid model performs best getting 100% accuracy on the same dataset. Some of the main machine learning algorithms used to predict the occurrence of CKD are Naïve Bayes, decision tree, K-nearest neighbor, random forest, support vector machine, LDA, GB, and neural network. In this study, we apply GB (gradient boosting), Gaussian Naïve Bayes, and decision tree along with random forest on the same set of features and compare the accuracy score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.