Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959806›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Cross-attention multi-branch CNN using DCE-MRI to classify breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Liang Sun, Haowen Tian, Hongwei Ge, Juan Tian, Yuxin Lin, Chang Liang, Tang Liu, Yiping Zhao

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liang SunThe College of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Haowen TianThe College of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Hongwei GeThe College of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Juan TianDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Yuxin LinDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Chang LiangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Tang LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Yiping ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to improve the accuracy of classifying luminal or non-luminal subtypes of breast cancer by using computer algorithms based on DCE-MRI, and to validate the diagnostic efficacy of the model by considering the patient's age of menarche and nodule size. Methods: DCE-MRI images of patients with non-specific invasive breast cancer admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University were collected. There were 160 cases in total, with 84 cases of luminal type (luminal A and luminal B and 76 cases of non-luminal type (HER 2 overexpressing and triple negative). Patients were grouped according to thresholds of nodule sizes of 20 mm and age at menarche of 14 years. A cross-attention multi-branch net CAMBNET) was proposed based on the dataset to predict the molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Diagnostic performance was assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 and area under the ROC curve (AUC). And the model is visualized with Grad-CAM. Results: Several classical deep learning models were included for diagnostic performance comparison. Using 5-fold cross-validation on the test dataset, all the results of CAMBNET are significantly higher than the compared deep learning models. The average prediction recall, accuracy, precision, and AUC for luminal and non-luminal types of the dataset were 89.11%, 88.44%, 88.52%, and 96.10%, respectively. For patients with tumor size <20 mm, the CAMBNET had AUC of 83.45% and ACC of 90.29% for detecting triple-negative breast cancer. When classifying luminal from non-luminal subtypes for patients with age at menarche years, our CAMBNET model achieved an ACC of 92.37%, precision of 92.42%, recall of 93.33%, F1of 92.33%, and AUC of 99.95%. Conclusions: The CAMBNET can be applied in molecular subtype classification of breasts. For patients with menarche at 14 years old, our model can yield more accurate results when classifying luminal and non-luminal subtypes. For patients with tumor sizes ≤20 mm, our model can yield more accurate result in detecting triple-negative breast cancer to improve patient prognosis and survival.

Indexed as

attention mechanismbreast cancerdeep learningmolecular subtypesMRI

Identifiers

PMID36959806
PMCPMC10028183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read65
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.