ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Ponatinib and Dasatinib in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia With Central Nervous System Relapse: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- An unusual case of basophilic meningitis revealing a chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a report after almost three years of follow-up.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Relapse patterns focusing on central nervous system involvement after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Isolated central nervous system relapse in blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia: a case report.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2025Article
- Drug-Induced Reorganisation of Lipid Metabolism Limits the Therapeutic Efficacy of Ponatinib in Glioma Stem Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Case report: Olverembatinib monotherapy: the chemotherapy-free regimen for an elderly patient with relapsed Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCentral nervous system leukemia (CNSL) is the most common extramedullary relapse site in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), with a poor prognosis and high relapse rate.
methodsWe characterized the clinical data of 21 Ph-positive B-ALL patients to analyze the efficacy and safety of ponatinib for patients with central nervous system relapsed Ph-positive ALL retrospectively.
resultsThere were 11 males and 10 females in the cohort, and their median age was 45 (9-58) years old. The total CR (complete remission) rate was 90.5%. All 9 patients achieved CR in the ponatinib group, and 10 patients achieved CR in the dasatinib group (100% vs 83.3%, respectively;
conclusion(1) Ph-positive CNSL patients seemed to have a high rate of response and postinduction MRD negativity with ponatinib and dasatinib, but ponatinib seemed to show a shorter time to achieve remission than dasatinib. (2) Ponatinib maintenance treatment might show superior survival for Ph-positive CNSL patients with or without the T315I mutation. (3) Ponatinib and dasatinib seemed to be both safe for the clinical application of Ph-positive CNSL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.