Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959699›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2023

Cine magnetic resonance urography as a new approach for postoperative evaluation of the reconstructed upper urinary tract: a multicenter study.

Xinfei Li, Zhihua Li, Xiang Wang, Weijie Zhu, Mingming Ma, Peng Zhang, Hongjian Zhu, He Wang, Xuesong Li, Liqun Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xinfei LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4201-2443
Zhihua LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6998-2522
Xiang WangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2923-1828
Weijie ZhuDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1886-6107
Mingming MaDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5679-9742
Peng ZhangClinic of Urology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0443-8216
Hongjian ZhuClinic of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7577-3425
He WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8023-4058
Xuesong LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7030-0856
Liqun ZhouDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2795-9038
Peking University First Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of cine magnetic resonance urography (cine MRU) as a novel postoperative examination after upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery.

methodsNinety-six patients underwent cine MRU for postoperative evaluation between August 2015 and August 2020. The morphological observations included regular peristalsis, anastomosis, urine flow signals, and reflux. The quantitative evaluations included luminal diameter, peristaltic amplitude, contraction ratio, peristaltic waves, and ureteric jets. The surgical outcomes were classified as success, gray area, or failure by combining the results of cine MRU, symptoms, and the degree of hydronephrosis.

resultsThere was no obvious stenosis of the anastomosis in 83 patients (86.46%). Regular peristalsis of the ureter and signals of urination was observed in 85 (88.54%) and 84 patients (87.50%), respectively. In addition, three patients (3.13%) showed urine reflux. The patients in both the success group and the gray area group showed significantly different creatinine levels (success 86.2 ± 22.3 μmol/L vs. failure 110.7 ± 8.2 μmol/L,

conclusionCine MRU demonstrates the morphology and function of the reconstructed upper urinary tract. The results of cine MRU can be used to evaluate the surgical effect, providing guidance for further treatment.

Indexed as

UreterUrinary TractHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyUrographyCine MRUmagnetic resonance imagingreconstructive surgeryureterureteric stricture

Identifiers

PMID36959699
PMCPMC10679594
OpenAlexW4315780351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.