ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023
Analysis of optimal volume fraction percentage and influencing factors of bone cement distribution in vertebroplasty using digital techniques.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of curved vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Bone cement distribution patterns in vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring the MRI-based vertebral bone quality score as a novel predictor of spongy cement distribution in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures following percutaneous vertebral augmentation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Short-term gains, long-term pains: a comparative study of percutaneous vertebroplasty vs. kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Bone cement distribution patterns influence cage subsidence after OLIF-AF-SEA in elderly patients with osteoporotic lumbar degeneration.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Quantitative analysis of bone cement dispersion height in percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty and comparison of therapeutic effects.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Percutaneous vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: minimally invasive techniques and clinical outcomes.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Surgical robot-guided unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty: anatomical features and clinical efficacy of a modified transverse process-pedicle approach.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Enhancing percutaneous kyphoplasty efficacy in elderly osteoporotic fractures through optimal cement filling ratio.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo explore the optimal volume fraction percentage (VF%) and influencing factors of bone cement distribution in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) using digital techniques. PATIENTS AND
methodsFrom January 2019 to February 2021, 150 patients with 0VCF who underwent PVP surgery in our hospital were analyzed. Based on postoperative X-ray and CT, the spatial distribution score of the intravertebral cement was calculated and the patients were divided into two groups: 0-7 were divided into group A; 8-10 were divided into group B. The general data of the two groups of patients were compared, and Mimics three-dimensional reconstruction images were used to measure the cement dispersion volume (CDV), vertebral body volume (VBV), and VF%. Factors affecting bone cement distribution were included in a multifactorial logistic regression analysis to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calculate a cut-off value for the extensive distribution of bone cement, and analyze the correlation between bone cement distribution scores and VF%.
resultsThere were 60 patients in group A and 90 patients in group B. Univariate analysis showed that bone mineral density (BMD), cement leakage, CDV, and VF% were significantly lower in group A than in group B (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that BMD and VF% were independent influencing factors on bone cement distribution. The area under the curve (AUC) of VF% was 84.7%, and the cut-off value for extensive distribution of bone cement was 28.58%, which corresponded to a sensitivity and specificity of 72.2% and 91.7%, respectively. There was a strong correlation between the cement distribution score and VF% (r = 0.895, p < 0.001).
conclusionBMD and VF% were important independent influencing factors of bone cement distribution. Extensive bone cement distribution can be achieved when the VF% reaches 28.58%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.