Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959645›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Knowledge of the abortion law and key legal issues of sexual and reproductive health and rights among recently arrived migrants in Sweden: a cross-sectional survey.

Veronika Tirado, Anna Mia Ekström, Nicola Orsini, Claudia Hanson, Susanne Strömdahl

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Veronika TiradoDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Veronika.Tirado@ki.se.
Anna Mia EkströmDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nicola OrsiniDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanne StrömdahlDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), including access and information on the laws and policies related to abortion, varies considerably between countries. Migrants may have limited knowledge of SRHR and related resources in their new country. This study investigates migrants' knowledge of the right to safe and legal abortion and other associated factors including the recent law on sexual consent, the legal age for sexual consent and age to marry in Sweden.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study from 2018 to 2019 among recent migrants attending high schools or Swedish language schools. Descriptive statistics were computed on the knowledge of the Swedish abortion law and other legal aspects. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess if migrants' socio-demographic characteristics were associated with knowledge (i.e. correct/incorrect) of the Swedish abortion law and other key SRHR-related legal issues.

resultsOf the total 6,263 participants, 3,557 (57%) responded about whether it is legal to have an induced abortion in Sweden, and of these, 2,632 (74%) answered incorrectly. While more than half (61%) of the respondents knew the sexual consent law, nearly half (48%) did not know that sexual consent is also required for married couples. About 90% correctly responded that it is illegal to have sex with a minor (under the age of 15) and were aware of the legal age (18 years) to marry in Sweden. Incorrect knowledge of the Swedish abortion law was associated with being religious (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 2.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42-3.15), not having previous sexual health education (AOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.38-2.05), coming from a country with predominantly restrictive abortion laws (AOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16-1.84), low level of education (AOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04-1.61) and having a temporary residence permit (AOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02-1.57).

conclusionWe found a substantial lack of knowledge among migrants of reproductive age in Sweden regarding important laws and policies of SRHR, particularly the right to abortion. SRHR-related programmes and comprehensive sexual health education for recently arrived migrants could include components to increase knowledge of legal and safe abortions and other laws concerning SRHR.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedTransients and MigrantsAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyReproductionReproductive HealthSwedenAbortionKnowledgeLawsMigrantsRightsSexual and reproductive health and rightsSexual consentSurveySweden

Identifiers

PMID36959645
PMCPMC10035217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read166
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.