Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959581›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Evaluation of the impact of technical physicians on improving individual patient care with technology.

Marleen Groenier, Koen Spijkerboer, Lisanne Venix, Lars Bannink, Saskia Yperlaan, Quinten Eyck, Jeannette G van Manen, Heleen A Th Miedema

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marleen GroenierTechnical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands. m.groenier@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7298-8431
Koen SpijkerboerTechnical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2892-4091
Lisanne VenixTechnical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Lars BanninkTechnical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Saskia YperlaanTechnical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Quinten EyckTechnical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jeannette G van ManenTechnical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-3983
Heleen A Th MiedemaTechnical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8330-7902
University of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid introduction of technical innovations in healthcare requires that professionals are adequately prepared for correct clinical use of medical technology. In response to the technological transformation of healthcare, a new type of professional, the Technical Physician (TP), was created and is trained to improve individual patient care using technology tailored to the needs of individual patients. This study investigates the TPs' impact on patient care in terms of innovation, effectiveness, efficiency, and patient safety.

methodSemi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 30 TPs and 17 medical specialists (MSs) working in academic or teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. The pre-structured and open-ended interview questions focused on: 1) the perceived impact on innovation, effectiveness, efficiency, and safety, and 2) opportunities and challenges in daily work.

resultsTPs and MSs unanimously experienced that TPs contributed to innovation. A majority indicated that effectiveness (TP 57%; MS 71%) and efficiency (TP 67%; MS 65%) of clinical practice had increased. For safety, 87% of TPs but only 47% of MSs reported an increase. The main explanation given for TPs positive impact was combining medical and technical knowledge. Mainly organizational barriers were mentioned as a potential cause for a less visible contribution of TPs. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: TPs and MSs unanimously agreed that TPs contributed to innovating patient care through their integrative medical and technical competencies. Most TPs and MSs also reported increased effectiveness, efficiency, and safety of patient care due to the TPs' work. TPs and MSs expected that the TPs' impact on direct and indirect patient care will be enhanced once organizational barriers are removed.

Indexed as

MedicinePhysiciansDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient CareTechnologyMedical devicesMedical education, health professionsOutcome assessmentPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID36959581
PMCPMC10037766
OpenAlexW4360604300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.