ArticleBMC psychiatry2023
Clinicians' perceptions and practices of diagnostic assessment in psychiatric services.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicians' practices and attitudes toward depression assessment: a cross-sectional survey study.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Perceptions of mental health stigma toward diagnostic labels among health professionals and mental health users: a Delphi study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- A Vignette-Based Measure of Mental Health Literacy (PDR-V): Reliability, Validity, and Mindfulness Associations in a Cross-Sectional Sample.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Motives and modifying factors for giving or rejecting psychiatric diagnoses in general medicine and psychiatry - a qualitative interview study.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics: An unapproached issue when defining psychiatric refractory disease in the context of euthanasia.PLOS mental health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic assessment in psychiatric services typically involves applying clinical judgment to information collected from patients using multiple sources, including anamnesis and structured diagnostic interviews. Research shows that clinicians' perceptions of diagnostic assessment are associated with their diagnostic practices, and that perceptions and practices may vary according to clinician characteristics. Examining clinicians' perceptions and practices of diagnostic assessment is important for quality improvement in psychiatric services, including implementation of evidence-based practice procedures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate clinicians' perceptions and practices of diagnostic assessment in psychiatric services and examine whether these perceptions and practices varied according to profession and age, with the aim of providing a basis for quality improvement.
methodsA total of 183 (53.2%) clinicians in community-based adult psychiatric services in Stockholm, Sweden participated in an online survey. Differences between professions were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests and effect sizes were calculated. Associations of clinicians' perceptions with their age were examined using Spearman correlations.
resultsOverall, clinicians had positive attitudes toward diagnostic assessment, and they considered themselves as competent. Differences were as most pronounced between nurses and other professions. Nursed had conducted fewer assessments, perceived themselves as less competent, and reported to a smaller extent to be able to determine which diagnosis should be the target for treatment in patients with multiple diagnoses. There were no associations of clinicians' perceptions with their age. Some potential areas of improvement were identified, including clinician qualifications, education in diagnostic assessment, and contents of diagnostic assessment.
conclusionsThe results of the present study may provide a basis for quality improvement in psychiatric services. For example, it may be important to pay attention to potential differences in perceptions and practices between professions in efforts to improve quality of assessment and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.