Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959552›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2023

Genome-wide mapping of signatures of selection using a high-density array identified candidate genes for growth traits and local adaptation in chickens.

Salvatore Mastrangelo, Slim Ben-Jemaa, Francesco Perini, Filippo Cendron, Filippo Biscarini, Emiliano Lasagna, Mauro Penasa, Martino Cassandro

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Salvatore Mastrangelo *Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, 90128, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-1981
Slim Ben-Jemaa *Laboratoire des Productions Animales et Fourragères, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie, Université de Carthage, 2049, Ariana, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7103-3315
Francesco PeriniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121, Perugia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2235-3926
Filippo CendronDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, 35020, Legnaro, Italy. filippo.cendron@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8221-7566
Filippo BiscariniInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology (IBBA), National Research Council (CNR), 20133, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-2354
Emiliano LasagnaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121, Perugia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-2921
Mauro PenasaDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, 35020, Legnaro, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9984-8738
Martino CassandroDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, 35020, Legnaro, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8709-2870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvailability of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping arrays and progress in statistical analyses have allowed the identification of genomic regions and genes under selection in chicken. In this study, SNP data from the 600 K Affymetrix chicken array were used to detect signatures of selection in 23 local Italian chicken populations. The populations were categorized into four groups for comparative analysis based on live weight (heavy vs light) and geographical area (Northern vs Southern Italy). Putative signatures of selection were investigated by combining three extended haplotype homozygosity (EHH) statistical approaches to quantify excess of haplotype homozygosity within (iHS) and between (Rsb and XP-EHH) groups. Presence of runs of homozygosity (ROH) islands was also analysed for each group.

resultsAfter editing, 541 animals and 313,508 SNPs were available for statistical analyses. In total, 15 candidate genomic regions that are potentially under selection were detected among the four groups: eight within a group by iHS and seven by combining the results of Rsb and XP-EHH, which revealed divergent selection between the groups. The largest overlap between genomic regions identified to be under selection by the three approaches was on chicken chromosome 8. Twenty-one genomic regions were identified with the ROH approach but none of these overlapped with regions identified with the three EHH-derived statistics. Some of the identified regions under selection contained candidate genes with biological functions related to environmental stress, immune responses, and disease resistance, which indicate local adaptation of these chicken populations.

conclusionsCompared to commercial lines, local populations are predominantly reared as backyard chickens, and thus, may have developed stronger resistance to environmental challenges. Our results indicate that selection can play an important role in shaping signatures of selection in local chicken populations and can be a starting point to identify gene mutations that could have a useful role with respect to climate change.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalChickensGenesGenomeSelection, GeneticAnimalsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetics, PopulationGenomicsHaplotypesHomozygoteItalyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideStress, Physiological

Identifiers

PMID36959552
PMCPMC10035218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read18
table measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.